首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Bulletin of the World Health Organization >Screening for sexually transmitted diseases in rural women in Papua New Guinea: are WHO therapeutic algorithms appropriate for case detection?
【2h】

Screening for sexually transmitted diseases in rural women in Papua New Guinea: are WHO therapeutic algorithms appropriate for case detection?

机译:在巴布亚新几内亚农村妇女中筛查性传播疾病:世卫组织治疗算法是否适合病例检测?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The presence of a large reservoir of untreated sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) in developing countries has prompted a number of suggestions for improving case detection, including the use of clinical algorithms and risk assessments to identify women likely to be infected when they present to clinics for other reasons. We used data from a community-based study of STDs to develop and evaluate algorithms for detection of cervical infection with Chlamydia trachomatis or Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and for detection of vaginal infection with Trichomonas vaginalis or bacterial vaginosis. The algorithms were derived using data from 192 randomly selected women, then evaluated on 200 self-selected women. We evaluated the WHO algorithm for vaginal discharge in both groups. The prevalences of cervical and vaginal infection in the randomly selected group were 27% and 50%, respectively, and 23% and 52%, respectively, in the self-selected group. The derived algorithms had high sensitivities in both groups, but poor specificities in the self-selected women, and the positive predictive values were unacceptably low. The WHO algorithms had extremely low sensitivity for detecting either vaginal or cervical infection because relatively few women reported vaginal discharge. Simple algorithms and risk assessments are not valid for case detection in this population.
机译:发展中国家存在大量未治疗的性传播疾病(STD),这为改善病例发现提供了许多建议,包括使用临床算法和风险评估来确定可能出现在诊所接受感染的妇女。其他原因。我们使用来自社区性病研究的数据来开发和评估算法,以检测沙眼衣原体或淋病奈瑟菌的宫颈感染,以及检测阴道毛滴虫或细菌性阴道病的阴道感染。该算法是使用来自192位随机选择的女性的数据得出的,然后对200位自选女性进行了评估。我们评估了两组WHO的白带清除算法。随机选择组的宫颈和阴道感染患病率分别为27%和50%,自选组分别为23%和52%。推导的算法在两组中都具有较高的敏感性,但是在自选女性中特异性较差,阳性预测值低得令人无法接受。 WHO的算法对检测阴道或宫颈感染的敏感性极低,因为报道的女性阴道分泌物相对较少。简单的算法和风险评估不适用于此人群中的病例检测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号