首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Radiosurgery and SBRT >An evaluation of the consistency of shifts reported by three different systems for non-coplanar treatments
【2h】

An evaluation of the consistency of shifts reported by three different systems for non-coplanar treatments

机译:三种非共面治疗系统报告的移位一致性评估

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Treatment of intra-cranial lesions sometimes requires a non-coplanar beam configuration. One of the most commonly used IGRT modalities, kV conebeam CT, cannot typically be used when large couch rotations are introduced. However, multiple other systems allow for imaging/tracking the patient for such situations. This work compares shift consistency from three independent systems, namely Varian’s Advanced Imaging, Brainlab’s Exactrac and Varian’s OSMS, all installed on the same linear accelerator. After a phantom was first positioned using conebeam CT, the three systems were used to determine shifts at different couch positions. This was done with and without intentional shifts inserted in the original phantom position. Results show that the difference in shifts between the three systems was never more than 0.7 mm (average of 0.2 mm, standard deviation of 0.2 mm). These results confirm that all three systems are equivalent to within 1 mm and may potentially be uses interchangeably, especially in cases where the PTV margin is on the order of 1 mm.
机译:颅内病变的治疗有时需要非共面光束配置。引入较大的旋转床时,通常无法使用最常用的IGRT模式之一,kV锥束CT。然而,多种其他系统允许针对这种情况对患者进行成像/跟踪。这项工作比较了三个独立系统的变速一致性,这三个独立系统分别安装在同一线性加速器上,这三个系统分别是Varian的Advanced Imaging,Brainlab的Exactrac和Varian的OSMS。在首先使用锥形束CT定位体模后,使用这三个系统来确定在不同的卧榻位置上的移位。进行此操作时,在原始幻像位置插入和不插入有意移动的情况下都可以。结果表明,这三个系统之间的偏移差异从未超过0.7毫米(平均值为0.2毫米,标准偏差为0.2毫米)。这些结果证实,所有三个系统都等效于1毫米以内,并且有可能可以互换使用,尤其是在PTV余量约为1毫米的情况下。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号