首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Annals of Pediatric Endocrinology Metabolism >Update on the current modalities used to screen high risk youth for prediabetes and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus
【2h】

Update on the current modalities used to screen high risk youth for prediabetes and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus

机译:有关用于筛查高危青少年的前驱糖尿病和/或2型糖尿病的当前方法的最新信息

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The modalities currently employed to screen for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)/prediabetes are HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), and 2-hour plasma glucose (PG) during an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The purpose of this review is to highlight the positive qualities and pitfalls of these diagnostic modalities and reflect on the most reasonable and effective approach to screen high risk youth. Given its inherent preanalytical advantages, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) continues to be the preferred diagnostic modality used by pediatricians to screen high risk youth. However, when the three aforementioned tests are performed in youths of different races/ethnicities, discrepant results for T2DM/prediabetes are observed. The prevalence rates for T2DM vary from 0.53% in Chinese youth (including youth of all body mass indexes) to 18.3% in high-risk, overweight, obese Korean youth. Moreover, the FPG is abnormal (>100 less than <126 mg/dL) in 15% of Korean youth versus 8.7% of Chinese youth. The prevalence rates for prediabetes are 1.49% in Chinese youth versus 21% in Emirati youth (HbA1c, 5.7%–6.4%). The coefficient of agreement, k, between these screening tests for T2DM are fair, 0.45–0.5 across all youth. However, using HbA1c as a comparator, the agreement is weak with FPG (k=0.18 in German youth versus k=0.396 in Korean youth). The American Diabetes Association (ADA) Standards of Medical Care Guidelines define “high risk youth” who need to be tested for T2DM and/or prediabetes. OGTT and HbA1c do not always detect T2DM in similar individuals. HbA1c may not be an ideal test for screening Hispanic and African American youth. FPG and OGTT are suitable screening tests for youth of ethnic minorities and those with cystic fibrosis or hemoglobinopathies. Performing all three tests either together or sequentially may be the only way to encompass all youth who have aberrations in different aspects of glucose homeostasis.
机译:当前用于筛查2型糖尿病(T2DM)/前驱糖尿病的方法是HbA1c,空腹血糖(FPG)和口服葡萄糖耐量测试(OGTT)的2小时血浆葡萄糖(PG)。这篇综述的目的是强调这些诊断方式的积极品质和陷阱,并反思筛选高危青少年的最合理,最有效的方法。鉴于其固有的分析前优势,糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)仍然是儿科医生筛查高危青少年的首选诊断方法。但是,当在不同种族/民族的年轻人中进行上述三个测试时,会观察到T2DM /前驱糖尿病的结果不一致。 T2DM的患病率从中国年轻人(包括所有体重指数的年轻人)的0.53%到高危,超重,肥胖的韩国年轻人的18.3%不等。此外,15%的韩国年轻人与8.7%的中国年轻人的FPG异常(> 100低于<126 mg / dL)。中国年轻人中糖尿病前期的患病率为1.49%,而阿联酋年轻人中为21%(HbA1c,5.7%–6.4%)。这些针对T2DM的筛查测试之间的一致性系数k在所有年轻人中均是0.45–0.5。但是,使用HbA1c作为比较剂,与FPG的一致性较弱(德国年轻人的k = 0.18,韩国年轻人的k = 0.396)。美国糖尿病协会(ADA)的医疗保健准则标准定义了需要接受T2DM和/或糖尿病前期检查的“高危青少年”。 OGTT和HbA1c并不总是在相似的个体中检测到T2DM。 HbA1c可能不是筛选西班牙裔和非洲裔美国年轻人的理想测试。 FPG和OGTT是适合少数民族和患有囊性纤维化或血红蛋白病的年轻人的筛查测试。一起或依次执行所有三个测试可能是涵盖所有在葡萄糖稳态不同方面有异常的年轻人的唯一方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号