首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>The Canadian Veterinary Journal >Comparaison de quatre protocoles de préparation préopératoire chez le bovin.
【2h】

Comparaison de quatre protocoles de préparation préopératoire chez le bovin.

机译:牛四种术前准备方案的比较。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study was designed to evaluate 4 preoperative skin preparations, that is, more specifically, to compare the efficacy of chlorhexidine gluconate (CG) and povidone-iodine (PI), as well as 2 hair removal techniques (clipper alone or clipper followed by razor) for preoperative skin preparation in cattle. The 4 protocols resulted in a significant decrease in the number of bacterial colony-forming units (cfu). Group 4 (clipping + shaving + CG) had a significantly lower number of preoperative cfu per gel plate compared with groups 1 (clipping + PI) and 3 (clipping + shaving + PI). Skin reaction frequency was significantly higher in groups 3 and 4 (47.8% for both protocols) than in groups 1 and 2 (clipping + PI or CG) (8.7% for both). Wound infection frequency was 4.3% (4/92) and no significant difference was observed between the 4 treatment groups. The 4 protocols tested were equivalent as to efficacy and satisfactorily decreased skin microflora. Clipping alone was shown to be preferable to clipping plus shaving as a method of hair removal in cattle, with fewer skin reactions and no more wound infections.
机译:这项研究旨在评估4种术前皮肤制剂,更具体地说,是比较葡萄糖酸氯己定(CG)和聚维酮碘(PI)的功效,以及2种脱毛技术(单独使用夹子或修剪器,然后使用剃刀) )用于牛的术前皮肤准备。这4种方案导致细菌菌落形成单位(cfu)的数量大大减少。与第1组(剪辑+ PI)和第3组(剪辑+剃须+ PI)相比,第4组(剪辑+剃须+ CG)的术前cfu数量明显低于每个凝胶板。在第3组和第4组中,皮肤反应频率(两种方案均为47.8%)明显高于第1组和第2组(剪辑+ PI或CG)(两者均为8.7%)。伤口感染频率为4.3%(4/92),在四个治疗组之间未观察到显着差异。所测试的4种方案在功效方面均等效,并且可以令人满意地减少皮肤微生物菌群。作为牛毛脱毛的一种方法,单独剪发比剪发+剃刮更可取,皮肤反应少,伤口感染也少。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号