首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Informatics >Discovering Outliers of Potential Drug Toxicities Using a Large-scale Data-driven Approach
【2h】

Discovering Outliers of Potential Drug Toxicities Using a Large-scale Data-driven Approach

机译:使用大规模数据驱动方法发现潜在药物毒性的异常值

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We systematically compared the adverse effects of cancer drugs to detect event outliers across different clinical trials using a data-driven approach. Because many cancer drugs are toxic to patients, better understanding of adverse events of cancer drugs is critical for developing therapies that could minimize the toxic effects. However, due to the large variabilities of adverse events across different cancer drugs, methods to efficiently compare adverse effects across different cancer drugs are lacking. To address this challenge, we present an exploration study that integrates multiple adverse event reports from clinical trials in order to systematically compare adverse events across different cancer drugs. To demonstrate our methods, we first collected data on 186,339 clinical trials from and selected 30 common cancer drugs. We identified 1602 cancer trials that studied the selected cancer drugs. Our methods effectively extracted 12,922 distinct adverse events from the clinical trial reports. Using the extracted data, we ranked all 12,922 adverse events based on their prevalence in the clinical trials, such as nausea 82%, fatigue 77%, and vomiting 75.97%. To detect the significant drug outliers that could have a statistically high possibility of causing an event, we used the boxplot method to visualize adverse event outliers across different drugs and applied Grubbs’ test to evaluate the significance. Analyses showed that by systematically integrating cross-trial data from multiple clinical trial reports, adverse event outliers associated with cancer drugs can be detected. The method was demonstrated by detecting the following four statistically significant adverse event cases: the association of the drug axitinib with hypertension (Grubbs’ test, P < 0.001), the association of the drug imatinib with muscle spasm (P < 0.001), the association of the drug vorinostat with deep vein thrombosis (P < 0.001), and the association of the drug afatinib with paronychia (P < 0.01).
机译:我们使用数据驱动的方法,系统地比较了癌症药物的不良反应,以检测不同临床试验中的事件异常值。由于许多抗癌药物对患者有毒,因此更好地了解抗癌药物的不良反应对于开发可将毒性作用降至最低的疗法至关重要。然而,由于不同癌症药物之间不良事件的差异很大,因此缺乏有效比较不同癌症药物不良反应的方法。为了应对这一挑战,我们提出了一项探索性研究,该研究整合了来自临床试验的多个不良事件报告,以便系统地比较不同癌症药物之间的不良事件。为了证明我们的方法,我们首先收集了186,339项临床试验的数据,并从中选择了30种常见的癌症药物。我们确定了1602项研究所选癌症药物的癌症试验。我们的方法有效地从临床试验报告中提取了12,922个明显的不良事件。使用提取的数据,我们根据临床试验中的患病率对所有12,922例不良事件进行了排名,例如恶心82%,疲劳77%和呕吐75.97%。为了检测在统计学上可能引起事件的显着药物异常值,我们使用箱线图方法将不同药物之间的不良事件异常值可视化,并应用Grubbs检验来评估其显着性。分析表明,通过系统地整合来自多个临床试验报告的交叉试验数据,可以检测与癌症药物相关的不良事件异常值。通过检测以下四个统计学上显着的不良事件病例证明了该方法:药物阿昔替尼与高血压的关联(Grubbs's test,P <0.001),药物伊马替尼与肌肉痉挛的关联(P <0.001),关联伏立诺他与深静脉血栓形成的相关性(P <0.001),以及阿法替尼与甲沟炎的相关性(P <0.01)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号