首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cancer Informatics >Evaluating Geographically Weighted Regression Models for Environmental Chemical Risk Analysis
【2h】

Evaluating Geographically Weighted Regression Models for Environmental Chemical Risk Analysis

机译:评估环境化学风险分析的地理加权回归模型

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In the evaluation of cancer risk related to environmental chemical exposures, the effect of many correlated chemicals on disease is often of interest. The relationship between correlated environmental chemicals and health effects is not always constant across a study area, as exposure levels may change spatially due to various environmental factors. Geographically weighted regression (GWR) has been proposed to model spatially varying effects. However, concerns about collinearity effects, including regression coefficient sign reversal (ie, reversal paradox), may limit the applicability of GWR for environmental chemical risk analysis. A penalized version of GWR, the geographically weighted lasso, has been proposed to remediate the collinearity effects in GWR models. Our focus in this study was on assessing through a simulation study the ability of GWR and GWL to correctly identify spatially varying chemical effects for a mixture of correlated chemicals within a study area. Our results showed that GWR suffered from the reversal paradox, while GWL overpenalized the effects for the chemical most strongly related to the outcome.
机译:在评估与环境化学物质接触有关的癌症风险时,许多相关化学物质对疾病的影响通常是令人感兴趣的。在整个研究区域中,相关环境化学物质与健康影响之间的关系并不总是恒定的,因为暴露水平可能由于各种环境因素而在空间上发生变化。提出了地理加权回归(GWR)来模拟空间变化的影响。但是,对共线性影响的担忧,包括回归系数符号反转(即反转悖论),可能会限制GWR在环境化学风险分析中的适用性。已经提出了GWR的一种惩罚形式,即地理加权套索,以补救GWR模型中的共线性效应。我们在这项研究中的重点是通过模拟研究评估GWR和GWL正确识别研究区域内相关化学物质混合物在空间上变化的化学作用的能力。我们的结果表明,GWR受逆转悖论之苦,而GWL则使与该结果最相关的化学物质的影响过大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号