首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cardiology Research and Practice >What Is the Best Proximal Anastomosis for the Free Right Internal Thoracic Artery during Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Revascularization? A Prospective Randomized Study
【2h】

What Is the Best Proximal Anastomosis for the Free Right Internal Thoracic Artery during Bilateral Internal Thoracic Artery Revascularization? A Prospective Randomized Study

机译:在双侧胸廓内动脉血运重建过程中右胸廓内动脉最佳近端吻合是什么?前瞻性随机研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective. Bilateral internal thoracic artery (BITA) grafting provides improved graft patency and potential survival advantage in selected patients as compared to single left internal thoracic artery (LITA) revascularization. The ideal functional BITA configuration remains controversial. Methods. Patients undergoing planned BITA revascularization with greater than 75% stenosis in both the left anterior descending artery (LAD) and in a circumflex branch were prospectively randomized to one of two proximal free right internal thoracic artery (RITA) connections directly off the aorta (Ao) (n = 12) or as a “t” graft off the LITA (t) (n = 12). The LITA was placed to the LAD in all cases, and the RITA was placed to a single lateral wall vessel. Intraoperative transit time flow measurements of all arterial grafts were performed, and RITA fractional flow parameters were compared between the 2 groups. Results. There were no differences in preoperative patient variables between the two groups. Cross-clamp times (91.5 + 15.3 versus 68.0 + 12.5 minutes, P < 0.01) and total cardiopulmonary bypass times (109.0 + 16.2 versus 85.0 + 15.1 minutes, P < 0.01) were shorter in the t group. The Ao group demonstrated significantly higher mean RITA flow (38.3 ± 13.5 versus 22.1 ± 9.5, P < 0.01), mean RITA conductance (flow/mean arterial pressure) (0.45 ± 0.16 versus 0.28 ± 0.11, P < 0.01), RITA fractional flow (0.52 ± 0.15 versus 0.36 ± 0.11, P < 0.01), and RITA fractional conductance (0.51 ± 0.15 versus 0.36 ± 0.11, P < 0.01) than the “t” grafted patients. Thirty-day mortality and wound infection were 0% for each group. Over an average of 42.8 + 6.6 months of followup there were no mortalities in either group. Repeat angiography were performed in 4 patients (33%) in the Ao group and 2 patients in the t group (16%). One occluded RITA graft and one ostial RITA stenosis were detected in the Ao group. Conclusions. Acute flow measurements indicate that the free RITA anastomosed to the aorta provides more acute fractional RITA flow than composite “t” grafting to the LITA. Longer-term angiographic and clinical followup are necessary to determine the consequences of these acute hemodynamic findings.
机译:目的。与单左胸内动脉(LITA)血运重建相比,双侧胸内动脉(BITA)移植可提高选定患者的移植通畅性和潜在生存优势。理想的功能性BITA配置仍然存在争议。方法。计划在左前降支(LAD)和回旋支中进行了大于75%狭窄的计划BITA血运重建的患者被随机分为直接靠近主动脉(Ao)的两个近端自由右胸内动脉(RITA)连接之一(n = 12)或作为LITA(t)的“ t”移植(n = 12)。在所有情况下,将LITA放置在LAD上,将RITA放置在单个侧壁容器上。对所有动脉移植物进行术中穿刺时间流量测量,并比较两组之间的RITA分流参数。结果。两组之间的术前患者变量无差异。 t组的交叉钳夹时间(91.5 + 15.3对68.0 + 12.5分钟,P <0.01)和总体外循环时间(109.0 + 16.2对85.0 + 15.1分钟,P <0.01)较短。 Ao组的平均RITA流量(38.3±13.5比22.1±9.5,P <0.01),平均RITA电导率(流量/平均动脉压)(0.45±0.16对0.28±0.11,P <0.01),RITA分数流量显着更高(“ 0.52±0.15对0.36±0.11,P <0.01)和RITA分数电导(0.51±0.15对0.36±0.11,P <0.01)。每组的30天死亡率和伤口感染率为0%。在平均42.8 + 6.6个月的随访中,两组均无死亡。 Ao组4例(33%)和t组2例(16%)进行了重复血管造影。在Ao组中检出1例RITA闭塞移植物和1例RITA口腔狭窄。结论。急性流量测量表明,与复合“ t”型移植到LITA相比,与主动脉吻合的游离RITA提供的锐度分数RITA流量更大。长期的血管造影和临床随访对于确定这些急性血液动力学发现的后果是必要的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号