首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Cardiovascular Ultrasound >Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography
【2h】

Head to head comparison of 2D vs real time 3D dipyridamole stress echocardiography

机译:2D与实时3D双嘧达莫应力超声心动图的头对头比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Real-time three-dimensional (RT-3D) echocardiography has entered the clinical practice but true incremental value over standard two-dimensional echocardiography (2D) remains uncertain when applied to stress echo. The aim of the present study is to establish the additional value of RT-3D stress echo over standard 2D stress echocardiography. We evaluated 23 consecutive patients (age = 65 ± 10 years, 16 men) referred for dipyridamole stress echocardiography with Sonos 7500 (Philips Medical Systems, Palo, Alto, CA) equipped with a phased – array 1.6–2.5 MHz probe with second harmonic capability for 2D imaging and a 2–4 MHz matrix-phased array transducer producing 60 × 70 volumetric pyramidal data containing the entire left ventricle for RT-3D imaging. In all patients, images were digitally stored in 2D and 3D for baseline and peak stress with a delay between acquisitions of less than 60 seconds. Wall motion analysis was interpreted on-line for 2D and off-line for RT-3D by joint reading of two expert stress ecocardiographist. Segmental image quality was scored from 1 = excellent to 5 = uninterpretable. Interpretable images were obtained in all patients. Acquisition time for 2D images was 67 ± 21 sec vs 40 ± 22 sec for RT-3D (p = 0.5). Wall motion analysis time was 2.8 ± 0.5 min for 2D and 13 ± 7 min for 3D (p = 0.0001). Segmental image quality score was 1.4 ± 0.5 for 2D and 2.6 ± 0.7 for 3D (p = 0.0001). Positive test results was found in 5/23 patients. 2D and RT-3D were in agreement in 3 out of these 5 positive exams. Overall stress result (positive vs negative) concordance was 91% (Kappa = 0.80) between 2D and RT-3D. During dipyridamole stress echocardiography RT-3D imaging is highly feasible and shows a high concordance rate with standard 2D stress echo. 2D images take longer time to acquire and RT-3D is more time-consuming to analyze. At present, there is no clear clinical advantage justifying routine RT-3D stress echocardiography use.
机译:实时三维(RT-3D)超声心动图已进入临床实践,但是当应用于应力回声时,相对于标准二维超声心动图(2D)的真实增量值仍然不确定。本研究的目的是建立RT-3D应力回波相对于标准2D应力超声心动图的附加值。我们使用Sonos 7500(Philips Medical Systems,Palo,Alto,CA)配备相控阵1.6–2.5 MHz探头并具有二次谐波功能的连续23位患者(年龄= 65±10岁,16位男性)进行双嘧达莫应力超声心动图检查用于2D成像和2–4 MHz矩阵相控阵换能器,产生60×70的体积锥体数据,其中包含用于RT-3D成像的整个左心室。在所有患者中,将图像数字化存储在2D和3D中,以获取基线和峰值应力,并且采集之间的延迟少于60秒。两位专家的压力心电图专家共同阅读,对壁运动分析进行了二维在线解释和RT-3D离线解释。分割图像质量的评分从1 =优秀到5 =无法解释。所有患者均获得了可解释的图像。 2D图像的采集时间为67±21秒,而RT-3D为40±22秒(p = 0.5)。壁运动分析时间对于2D是2.8±0.5分钟,对于3D是13±7分钟(p = 0.0001)。 2D的段图像质量得分为1.4±0.5,3D的段图像质量得分为2.6±0.7(p = 0.0001)。在5/23例患者中发现阳性测试结果。在这5项阳性检查中,有3项中2D和RT-3D一致。在2D和RT-3D之间,总体压力结果(正负)一致性为91%(Kappa = 0.80)。在潘生丁应力超声心动图检查中,RT-3D成像非常可行,并且与标准二维应力回声显示出很高的一致性。采集2D图像需要更长的时间,而RT-3D的分析则更耗时。目前,尚无明显的临床优势证明常规使用RT-3D应力超声心动图检查是合理的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号