Food limitation has been suggested as one of the most important factors affecting life history evolution in terrestrial vertebrates. However, this inference is based mainly on evidence from birds, and reproductive trade-offs may differ among groups with different forms of parental care. To study whether the costs of enlarged litters (decreased mass of offspring) would appear when food is not limiting, we performed outdoor enclosure experiments in which we manipulated simultaneously the litter size (control versus litter plus two pups) and food availability (control versus food-supplemented) of female bank voles, Clethrionomys glareolus. The weaning success of females increased significantly in response to supplementary food. When females were provided with extra food, no differences were observed in body masses of weanlings of control and enlarged litters. Further, food-supplemented females grew to larger sizes during nursing than unsupplemented females. Our experiment suggests that energetic requirements during nursing constrain the number of offspring that can be raised successfully in a particular breeding attempt. The results also indicate that unlimited food resources may increase future reproductive potential of females because they can use more energy for somatic growth.
展开▼
