首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Cardiology >Implications of the absence of st‐segment elevation in lead V4R in patients who have inferior wall acute myocardial infarction with right ventricular involvement
【2h】

Implications of the absence of st‐segment elevation in lead V4R in patients who have inferior wall acute myocardial infarction with right ventricular involvement

机译:下壁急性心肌梗死伴右室受累的患者中V4R铅缺乏分段抬高的含义

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: ST‐segment elevation of ± 1.0 mm in lead V4R has been shown to be a reliable marker of right ventricular involvement (RVI), a strong predictor of a poor outcome in patients with inferior acute myocardial infarction (IMI). However, patients with no ST‐segment elevation in lead V4R despite the presence of RVI have received little attention. Hypothesis: The study was undertaken to study the clinical features of patients with no ST‐segment elevation in lead V4R despite the presence of RVI, which means false negative, as such patients have received little attention in the past. Methods: We studied 62 patients with a first IMI. who had total occlusion of the right coronary artery (RCA) proximal to the first right ventricular branch and successful reperfusion within 6 h from symptom onset, to examine the implications of the absence of ST‐segment elevation in lead V4R despite the presence of RVI. Results: A standard 12‐lead electrocardiogram (ECG) and right precordial ECG (lead V4R) were recorded on admission, and three posterior chest ECGs (leads V7 to V9) were additionally recorded in 34 patients. Patients were classified according to the absence (Group 1, n = 18) or presence (Group 2, n = 44) of ST‐segment elevation of ± 1.0 mm in lead V4R on admission. Patients in Group 1 had a greater ST‐segment elevation in leads V7 to V9 (2.9 ± 2.4 vs. 1.4 ± 3.0 mm, p < 0.05), a higher frequency of a dominant RCA (defined as the distribution score ≥ 0.7) (72 vs. 11%, p < 0.001), and a higher peak creatine kinase level (3760 ±; 1548 vs. 2809 ± 1824 mU/ml, p < 0.05) than those in Group 2. Conclusions: In patients with IMI caused by the occlusion of the RCA proximal to the first right ventricular branch, no ST‐segment elevation in lead V4R can occur because of concomitant posterior involvement. In such patients, the incidence of RVI may be underestimated on the basis of ST‐segment elevation in lead V4R.
机译:背景:V4R铅的ST段抬高±1.0 mm已被证明是右心室受累(RVI)的可靠标志,这是下急性心肌梗死(IMI)患者预后不良的有力预测指标。但是,尽管存在RVI,但V4R铅无ST段抬高的患者很少受到关注。假设:本研究旨在研究尽管存在RVI,但V4R铅无ST段抬高的患者的临床特征,这意味着假阴性,因为这些患者过去很少受到关注。方法:我们研究了62例首次IMI患者。他们在症状发作后的6小时内完全闭塞了右心室第一分支附近的右冠状动脉(RCA),并在6小时内成功进行了再灌注,以检查尽管存在RVI,但V4R铅缺乏ST段抬高的影响。结果:入院时记录了标准的12导联心电图(ECG)和右心前心电图(导联V4R),另外34例患者还记录了3个后胸心电图(导联V7至V9)。根据入院时V4R铅ST段抬高±1.0 mm的情况(第1组,n = 18)或存在(第2组,n = 44)对患者进行分类。第1组患者的V7至V9导联ST段抬高更高(2.9±2.4 vs. 1.4±3.0 mm,p <0.05),显性RCA频率更高(定义为分布评分≥0.7)(72与第2组相比,肌酸激酶峰值水平更高(3760±; 1548对2809±1824 mU / ml,p <0.001),p <0.001)。结论:在IMI引起的IMI患者中右心室第一分支近端的RCA闭塞,由于并发后路受累,因此V4R导联不会出现ST段抬高。在此类患者中,根据V4R导联ST段抬高可能会低估RVI的发生率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号