首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Interventions in Aging >Graduated compression stockings in prevention of venous thromboembolism among acutely ill medical patients aged over 75 years: a French national survey
【2h】

Graduated compression stockings in prevention of venous thromboembolism among acutely ill medical patients aged over 75 years: a French national survey

机译:一项法国国家调查:75岁以上急症内科病人以分级加压袜预防静脉血栓栓塞

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: The thromboprophylactic efficacy of graduated compression stockings (GCS) has not yet been demonstrated in acutely ill medical patients, and guidelines vary considerably. Older acutely ill medical patients appear to constitute a distinctive population presenting high risks of both thrombosis and bleeding.>Objective: To evaluate the practices and beliefs of a panel of French geriatricians regarding GCS management in acutely ill medical patients aged over 75 years.>Methods: A survey was designed to study French geriatric practice concerning GCS use for thromboprophylaxis.>Results: A total of 111 geriatricians answered the questionnaire. Among the responders, 46% declared frequent or very frequent prescription of GCS for preventing venous thromboembolism (VTE) in acutely ill, hospitalized medical patients, 54% declaring that they frequently re-evaluated GCS prescription during the patient’s hospitalization. The main reason reported for discontinuing GCS use was patient request. Regarding complications of GCS, 87% of responders declared having already noted adverse effects with the use of GCS, although 80% estimated the risk of complications to be low or very low. In the context considered, the efficacy of wearing GCS was believed to be high or very high for 73% of responders. GCS prescription was judged to be in accordance with evidence-based medicine for 69%.>Conclusion: There is a gap between the frequent use of GCS to prevent VTE in older patients presenting an acute medical illness and the availability of data concerning their efficacy, safety, and management by nurses. Prospective trials including clinical and cost effectiveness are needed.
机译:>背景:尚未在急性病患者中证明渐进式压力袜(GCS)的血栓预防功效,指南也有很大差异。年龄较大的急性病患者似乎构成了一个独特的人群,具有血栓形成和出血的高风险。>目的:评估法国老年医学专家小组对年龄较大的急性病患者进行GCS管理的实践和信念超过75年。>方法:设计了一项调查研究法国老年医学有关GCS用于血栓预防的实践。>结果:共有111位老年医学专家回答了该问卷。在回应者中,有46%的人宣布经常或非常频繁地服用GCS处方,以预防急症住院的静脉血栓栓塞(VTE),有54%的人宣称他们在患者住院期间经常重新评估GCS的处方。报告停止使用GCS的主要原因是患者要求。关于GCS的并发症,有87%的应答者声称已经注意到使用GCS的不良反应,尽管80%的应答者估计并发症的风险较低或非常低。在考虑的情况下,对于73%的应答者来说,佩戴GCS的疗效被认为是很高或很高。判断GCS处方符合循证医学的规定为69%。>结论:在经常出现急性医疗疾病的老年患者中,频繁使用GCS预防VTE有一定的差距。有关其功效,安全性和护士管理的数据。需要进行包括临床和成本效益在内的前瞻性试验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号