首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Interventions in Aging >Olmesartan vs ramipril in the treatment of hypertension and associated clinical conditions in the elderly: a reanalysis of two large double-blind randomized studies at the light of the most recent blood pressure targets recommended by guidelines
【2h】

Olmesartan vs ramipril in the treatment of hypertension and associated clinical conditions in the elderly: a reanalysis of two large double-blind randomized studies at the light of the most recent blood pressure targets recommended by guidelines

机译:奥美沙坦与雷米普利治疗老年高血压及相关的临床状况:根据指南推荐的最新血压目标对两项大型双盲随机研究进行了重新分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper, we present the results of a reanalysis of the data of two large randomized, double-blind, parallel group studies with a similar design, comparing the efficacy of an angiotensin-receptor blocker (olmesartan medoxomil) with that of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ramipril), by applying two different blood pressure targets recently recommended by hypertension guidelines for all patients, irrespective of the presence of diabetes (<140/90 mmHg), and for elderly hypertensive patients (<150/90 mmHg). The efficacy of olmesartan was not negatively affected by age, sex, hypertension type, diabetes status or other concomitant clinical conditions, or cardiovascular risk factors. In most cases, olmesartan provided better blood pressure control than ramipril. Olmesartan was significantly more effective than ramipril in male patients, in younger patients (aged 65–69 years), in those with metabolic syndrome, obesity, dyslipidemia, preserved renal function, diastolic ± systolic hypertension, and, in general, in patients with a high or very high cardiovascular risk. Interestingly, patients previously untreated or treated with two or more antihypertensive drugs showed a significantly larger response with olmesartan than with ramipril. Thus, our results confirm the good efficacy of olmesartan in elderly hypertensives even when new blood pressure targets for antihypertensive treatment are considered. Such results may be relevant for the clinical practice, providing some hint on the possible different response of elderly hypertensive patients to two different drugs acting on the renin–angiotensin system, when patients are targeted according to the blood pressure levels recommended by recent hypertension guidelines.
机译:在本文中,我们提供了采用相似设计的两项大型随机,双盲,平行组研究的数据重新分析的结果,比较了血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(奥美沙坦medoxomil)和血管紧张素受体阻滞剂的疗效。转换酶抑制剂(雷米普利),通过应用高血压指南最近推荐的两种不同的血压目标,对所有患者,无论是否存在糖尿病(<140/90 mmHg),对于老年高血压患者(<150/90 mmHg)。奥美沙坦的疗效不受年龄,性别,高血压类型,糖尿病状况或其他伴随的临床状况或心血管危险因素的负面影响。在大多数情况下,奥美沙坦比雷米普利提供更好的血压控制。在男性患者,年轻患者(年龄在65-69岁之间),代谢综合征,肥胖,血脂异常,肾功能保持正常,舒张压±收缩期高血压的患者以及一般来说,奥美沙坦的患者比雷米普利更有效。心血管风险很高或很高。有趣的是,以前接受过两种或多种降压药治疗或未接受过降压药治疗的患者,奥美沙坦的疗效明显高于雷米普利。因此,我们的结果证实了奥美沙坦在老年高血压患者中的良好疗效,即使考虑使用新的降压治疗目标。这样的结果可能与临床实践有关,这为老年高血压患者根据最新高血压指南推荐的血压水平确定患者对两种作用于肾素-血管紧张素系统的药物的反应可能产生的不同提示。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号