首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Interventions in Aging >Efficacy and safety of donepezil galantamine and rivastigmine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Efficacy and safety of donepezil galantamine and rivastigmine for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:多奈哌齐加兰他敏和利凡斯的明治疗阿尔茨海默氏病的有效性和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pharmacologic treatments for Alzheimer’s disease include the cholinesterase inhibitors donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine. We reviewed their evidence by searching MEDLINE®, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1980 through 2007 (July) for placebo-controlled and comparative trials assessing cognition, function, behavior, global change, and safety. Thirty-three articles on 26 studies were included in the review. Meta-analyses of placebo-controlled data support the drugs’ modest overall benefits for stabilizing or slowing decline in cognition, function, behavior, and clinical global change. Three open-label trials and one double-blind randomized trial directly compared donepezil with galantamine and rivastigmine. Results are conflicting; two studies suggest no differences in efficacy between compared drugs, while one study found donepezil to be more efficacious than galantamine, and one study found rivastigmine to be more efficacious than donepezil. Adjusted indirect comparison of placebo-controlled data did not find statistically significant differences among drugs with regard to cognition, but found the relative risk of global response to be better with donepezil and rivastigmine compared with galantamine (relative risk = 1.63 and 1.42, respectively). Indirect comparisons also favored donepezil over galantamine with regard to behavior. Across trials, the incidence of adverse events was generally lowest for donepezil and highest for rivastigmine.
机译:阿尔茨海默氏病的药物治疗包括胆碱酯酶抑制剂多奈哌齐,加兰他敏和利凡斯的明。我们通过搜索MEDLINE ®,Embase,Cochrane图书馆和1980年至2007年(7月)的国际药物文摘,对安慰剂对照和比较试验进行了评估,这些试验评估了认知,功能,行为,全球变化, 和安全。该评价包括关于26项研究的33篇文章。安慰剂对照数据的荟萃分析支持该药物在稳定或减缓认知,功能,行为和临床总体变化下降方面的适度总体优势。 3项开放标签试验和1项双盲随机试验直接比较了多奈哌齐与加兰他敏和利凡斯的明。结果是矛盾的;两项研究表明所比较药物之间的疗效无差异,而一项研究发现多奈哌齐比加兰他敏更有效,而一项研究发现利凡斯的明比多奈哌齐更有效。安慰剂对照数据的调整后间接比较未发现药物之间在认知方面有统计学上的显着差异,但发现多奈哌齐和利凡斯的明与加兰他敏相比,总体反应的相对风险更好(相对风险分别为1.63和1.42)。在行为方面,间接比较也显示多奈哌齐优于加兰他敏。在所有试验中,多奈哌齐的不良事件发生率通常最低,而卡巴拉汀的不良事件发生率最高。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号