首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Pharmacy: Journal of Pharmacy Education and Practice >Asthma-Targeted MURs: How Confident are Community Pharmacists in Delivering Different Interventions?
【2h】

Asthma-Targeted MURs: How Confident are Community Pharmacists in Delivering Different Interventions?

机译:针对哮喘的MUR:社区药剂师对提供不同干预措施的信心如何?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study aimed to identify and determine the confidence level of community pharmacists in providing different interventions during asthma-targeted medicine use reviews (MURs). A self-administered questionnaire was posted to 487 pharmacies accredited to provide the service, across Greater London, Southampton, Cornwall, Sheffield and Norwich. A total of 122 responses were obtained, giving a response rate of 25% (122/487). Around half of the community pharmacists (51.6%) were providing more than 60 asthma-targeted MURs annually with inhaler technique being the most offered intervention and stepping up/down therapy being the least. The majority of community pharmacists (94.3%) were confident in providing inhaler technique advice, followed by smoking cessation (91%). However, confidence was less with relevant vaccination (61.5%) and stepping up/down patients’ therapy (56.6%). Confidence level can vary between community pharmacists regarding different interventions provided during respiratory MURs. The results stress the need to promote community pharmacists’ confidence in providing interventions such as stepping up/down therapy during asthma-targeted MURs. Additional research in this field is highly recommended in order to evaluate community pharmacists’ confidence level on a national scale and to determine the factors influencing it. The study also suggests that provision of different interventions during respiratory MURs can be related to how community pharmacists perceive their role.
机译:这项研究旨在确定和确定社区药剂师在针对哮喘的药物使用评估(MUR)期间提供不同干预措施的信心水平。在大伦敦,南安普敦,康沃尔,谢菲尔德和诺威奇等地的487家获授权提供服务的药房中发布了一份自行管理的问卷。总共获得122个响应,响应率为25%(122/487)。大约一半的社区药剂师(51.6%)每年提供60多种以哮喘为目标的MUR,其中吸入器技术是提供最多的干预措施,而升压/降压治疗则最少。大多数社区药剂师(94.3%)对提供吸入技术建议充满信心,其次是戒烟(91%)。但是,相关疫苗接种(61.5%)和加/减患者治疗(56.6%)的信心降低。社区药剂师对呼吸性MUR期间提供的不同干预措施的信心水平可能会有所不同。结果强调需要提高社区药剂师在提供针对哮喘的MUR期间加/减治疗等干预措施的信心。强烈建议在该领域进行其他研究,以便在全国范围内评估社区药师的信心水平并确定影响其的因素。该研究还表明,在呼吸道MUR期间提供不同的干预措施可能与社区药师如何看待其作用有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号