首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Medicine >Writing to patients: a randomised controlled trial
【2h】

Writing to patients: a randomised controlled trial

机译:给患者写信:一项随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

It has been suggested that consultants should consider writing directly to patients with a summary of their outpatient consultation. In a controlled trial involving consecutive new referrals to a haematology outpatient clinic, we randomised patients to receive either a personal letter from their consultant summarising their consultation (n = 77) or a brief note thanking them for attending the clinic (n = 73). Patients were assessed for recall of and satisfaction with the consultation by a single independent observer, using standardised methods. At the second visit to outpatients, the patients' median percentage recall of items discussed during the consultation was 67% (IQ range 50–80%) in the intervention group, versus 57% (IQ range 43–76%) in the control group (p = 0.3). Strongly positive views on the personal letter were expressed by patients and referring clinicians. The findings suggest that although personal letters do not substantially improve recall of the clinical encounter, they are feasible, highly valued by patients and acceptable to referring clinicians.
机译:建议顾问应考虑直接向患者写信,并附有他们的门诊咨询摘要。在一项涉及连续多次转诊至血液科门诊的对照试验中,我们将患者随机分组,以接收其顾问总结的私人信件(n = 77)或感谢他们参加该诊所的简短说明(n = 73)。使用标准化方法,由一个独立的观察者对患者进行回想和对咨询的满意度进行评估。在第二次门诊就诊时,干预组患者在咨询期间讨论的项目的召回中位数百分比为67%(IQ范围为50-80%),而对照组为57%(IQ范围为43-76%)。 (p = 0.3)。患者和转诊医生对个人信件表达了非常积极的看法。研究结果表明,尽管私人信件并不能在很大程度上改善对临床遭遇的回忆,但它们是可行的,受到患者的高度评价并且被转诊的临床医生所接受。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号