首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >Is Moderate Intensity Exercise Training Combined with High Intensity Interval Training More Effective at Improving Cardiorespiratory Fitness than Moderate Intensity Exercise Training Alone?
【2h】

Is Moderate Intensity Exercise Training Combined with High Intensity Interval Training More Effective at Improving Cardiorespiratory Fitness than Moderate Intensity Exercise Training Alone?

机译:中强度运动训练与高强度间隔训练相结合是否比单独进行中强度运动训练更有效地改善了心肺功能?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of either continuous moderate intensity exercise training (CMIET) alone vs. CMIET combined with a single weekly bout of high intensity interval training (HIIT) on cardiorespiratory fitness. Twenty nine sedentary participants (36.3 ± 6.9 yrs) at moderate risk of cardiovascular disease were recruited for 12 weeks of exercise training on a treadmill and cycle ergometer. Participants were randomised into three groups: CMIET + HIIT (n = 7; 8-12 x 60 sec at 100% VO2max, 150 sec active recovery), CMIET (n = 6; 30 min at 45-60% oxygen consumption reserve (VO2R)) and a sedentary control group (n = 7). Participants in the CMIET + HIIT group performed a single weekly bout of HIIT and four weekly sessions of CMIET, whilst the CMIET group performed five weekly CMIET sessions. Probabilistic magnitude-based inferences were determined to assess the likelihood that the true value of the effect represents substantial change. Relative VO2max increased by 10.1% (benefit possible relative to control) in in the CMIET + HIIT group (32.7 ± 9.2 to 36.0 ± 11.5 mL·kg-1·min-1) and 3.9% (benefit possible relative to control) in the CMIET group (33.2 ± 4.0 to 34.5 ± 6.1 mL·kg-1·min-1), whilst there was a 5.7% decrease in the control group (30.0 ± 4.6 to 28.3 ± 6.5 mL·kg-1·min-1). It was ‘unclear’ if a clinically significant difference existed between the effect of CMIET + HIIT and CMIET on the change in VO2max. Both exercising groups showed clinically meaningful improvements in VO2max. Nevertheless, it remains ‘unclear’ whether one type of exercise training regimen elicits a superior improvement in cardiorespiratory fitness relative to its counterpart.Key Points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">Both continuous moderate intensity exercise training (CMIET) alone and CMIET combined with a single weekly bout of high intensity interval training (CMIET + HIIT) elicit ‘possibly beneficial’ clinically meaningful improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness.Cardiorespiratory fitness improved by ~1.0 MET in the CMIET + HIIT exercise intervention group, which likely leads to important long-term prevention implications as a 1 MET increase in cardiorespiratory fitness has been linked with an 18% reduction in deaths due to CVD.There was 100% adherence to interval sessions in the CMIET + HIIT group, suggesting this combination of training can be well-tolerated in previously inactive overweight/obese individuals.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较单独进行连续中等强度运动训练(CMIET)与每周进行一次高强度间歇训练(HIIT)结合CMIET对心肺健康的有效性。招募了29名久坐不动的参与者(36.3±6.9岁),患有心血管疾病的风险中等,他们在跑步机和自行车测功机上进行了12周的运动训练。参与者被随机分为三组:CMIET + HIIT(n = 7;在100%VO2max时为8-12 x 60秒,主动恢复150秒),CMIET(n = 6;在45-60%的氧气消耗量储备下为30分钟(VO2R) ))和久坐的对照组(n = 7)。 CMIET + HIIT组的参与者每周进行一次HIIT回合,每周进行四次CMIET会议,而CMIET组的参与者每周进行五次CMIET会议。确定了基于概率大小的推论,以评估效应的真实值代表实质性变化的可能性。 CMIET + HIIT组(32.7±9.2至36.0±11.5 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 )和CMIET组的3.9%(相对于对照而言可能有好处)(33.2±4.0至34.5±6.1 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 ),而对照组降低了5.7%(30.0±4.6至28.3±6.5 mL·kg -1 ·min -1 )。目前尚不清楚“ CMIET + HIIT和CMIET对VO2max的变化是否存在临床上的显着差异”。两个运动组均显示最大摄氧量的临床意义改善。然而,相对于同类运动训练方法,一种运动训练方案是否能更好地改善心肺功能仍是未知的。要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc”> <!- -list-behavior = unordered prefix-word = mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0-> 单独连续持续中等强度运动训练(CMIET)和CMIET结合每周一次高强度间歇训练训练(CMIET + HIIT)可以使心脏呼吸健康度在临床上有意义的改善。 CMIET + HIIT运动干预组使心脏呼吸适应度提高约1.0 MET,这可能会导致长期的重要预防心肺功能提高1 MET与CVD导致的死亡减少18%有关。 CMIET + HIIT组坚持100%的间歇性锻炼,表明这种训练相结合在以前可以被很好地容忍狡猾的不活跃的超重/肥胖者。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号