首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >A Comparison of Kinematics and Performance Measures of Two Rowing Ergometers
【2h】

A Comparison of Kinematics and Performance Measures of Two Rowing Ergometers

机译:两个划船测功机的运动学和性能指标的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Rowing injuries have been attributed to poor technique, suggesting a need to understand the mechanics of rowing and the influence on technique of different training regimes and ergometers. The aims of this study were to investigate the repeatability of the kinematics of the lumbopelvic region during rowing and to compare these kinematics between rowing on two different ergometers. An electromagnetic motion measuring device in conjunction with a load cell was used to determine the ergometer rowing kinematics of 12 rowers. Subjects were tested on three occasions at two different stroke rates, with an interval of one week between testing. Two datasets were obtained for the Concept II, to establish the repeatability of the kinematics, and one for the WaterRower. Bland and Altman’s mean difference technique was used to test for consistency of technique, and the difference between ergometers was assessed using Students’ paired T-tests. The kinematic measures of the lumbo pelvic region during rowing demonstrated high repeatability. The two ergometers showed a similarity in force profiles but some significant differences in rowing kinematics. There was greater rotation of the thigh segment in the sagittal plane throughout the stroke on the WaterRower (p < 0.01). There were also trends indicating that rotation of the pelvis in the sagittal plane was different between the two ergometers, for example on the Concept the mean angle of the pelvis at the catch was 5.4° and on the WaterRower it was 2.4° (p < 0.05). Measurement of lumbopelvic kinematics during rowing on a Concept II ergometer is repeatable. However, rowing kinematics varies between ergometers. Because a full analysis comparing rowing kinematics on water with rowing ergometers has not been made in this study, no conclusions regarding which ergometer simulates rowing on water can be made. The implications of the effect of these differences in technique requires further investigation.Key Points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">Measurement of lumbopelvic kinematics during rowing on a Concept II ergometer is repeatable.Rowing kinematics varies between the WaterRower and Concept II
机译:划船受伤归因于技术水平低下,这表明需要了解划船的机理以及对不同训练方式和测力计的影响。本研究的目的是研究划船过程中腰部骨盆区域运动学的可重复性,并比较两种不同的测力计上划船之间的运动学。结合称重传感器的电磁运动测量设备用于确定12位划船者的测功机划船运动学。在三种情况下以两种不同的卒中率对受试者进行了测试,两次测试之间的间隔为一周。为Concept II获得了两个数据集,以建立运动学的可重复性,为WaterRower获得了一个。使用Bland和Altman的均数差异技术来检验技术的一致性,并使用学生配对的T检验评估测力计之间的差异。赛艇时腰部骨盆区域的运动学测量显示出高重复性。这两个测功机在力分布上显示出相似性,但在划船运动学上存在一些显着差异。在WaterRower的整个行程中,大腿段在矢状面上的旋转更大(p <0.01)。还有趋势表明,两个测力计之间骨盆在矢状面上的旋转是不同的,例如,在Concept上,渔获物处骨盆的平均角度为5.4°,而WaterRower上的平均角度为2.4°(p <0.05 )。在Concept II测功机上划船时腰椎运动学的测量是可重复的。但是,测功机之间的划船运动学有所不同。由于在这项研究中尚未对将水上划船运动学与划船测功器进行比较进行全面分析,因此无法得出关于哪个测功器模拟水上划船的结论。这些技术差异的影响的含义需要进一步研究。要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc”> <!-list-behavior = unordered prefix-word = mark- type = disc max-label-size = 0-> 在Concept II测功机上划船时腰椎运动学的测量是可重复的。 WaterRower和Concept II之间的摇摆运动学各不相同

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号