首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Sports Science Medicine >A Pilot Study Comparing Two Field Tests with the Treadmill Run Test in Soccer Players
【2h】

A Pilot Study Comparing Two Field Tests with the Treadmill Run Test in Soccer Players

机译:对足球运动员的两个田间测试与跑步机跑步测试进行比较的初步研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study compares the performances obtained during soccer-specific field tests of the 20 m multistage shuttle run test (MST) and the Yo-Yo intermittent endurance test (YIET), with the measured maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) obtained in both field tests as well as that obtained in the traditional test of running to exhaustion on a treadmill (TRT), in young trained soccer players. Twenty-one National-level youth players performed, in random order, the MST and YIET to determine the relationship between the two field tests. From these, eight randomly chosen players performed their field tests as well as a TRT, equipped with an ambulatory gas exchange measurement device. Pearson correlation coefficient analysis showed that the players’ performance (i.e. distance covered) in the MST and YIET was correlated (r = 0.65, p < 0.01). Players’ performance in the YIET was not significantly correlated with the measured VO2max obtained in the same YIET nor with the measured VO2max obtained in the MST and in the TRT (all p > 0.05). In contrast, significant correlations were observed between the players’ performance in the MST with the measured VO2max obtained in the same MST and in the YIET (both p < 0.05); and attained almost statistical significance with the measured VO2max in the TRT (p = 0.06). The lack of association between distances covered in the YIET with all the measured VO2max values suggest that measured VO2max per se may not be suitable to characterize soccer players’ intermittent endurance performance. In comparison with the MST, the YIET may be a more favourable field-based assessment of soccer player’s endurance performance.Key Points class="unordered" style="list-style-type:disc">Both the Yo-Yo intermittent endurance test and 20m multistage shuttle run test are valid measures of aerobic exertion in soccer playersMeasured VO2max per se may not be suitable to characterize soccer players’ intermittent endurance performance.In comparison with the MST, the YIET may be a more favourable field-based assessment of soccer player’s endurance performance.
机译:这项研究比较了20 m多阶段穿梭跑测试(MST)和悠悠球间歇耐力测试(YIET)在足球特定野外测试中获得的性能,以及在两种野外测试中获得的最大摄氧量(VO2max),分别为以及在训练有素的年轻足球运动员中在跑步机(TRT)上进行尽力测试的传统测试中获得的结果。 21名国家级青年选手以随机顺序执行MST和YIET,以确定两次现场测试之间的关系。从中,随机选择了八名选手进行了他们的现场测试以及配备了动态气体交换测量装置的TRT。皮尔森相关系数分析表明,球员在MST和YIET中的表现(即距离)是相关的(r = 0.65,p <0.01)。玩家在YIET中的表现与在同一YIET中获得的测得VO2max以及在MST和TRT中获得的测得VO2max均无显着相关性(所有p> 0.05)。相反,在同一个MST和YIET中,玩家在MST中的表现与测得的VO2max之间存在显着的相关性(均p <0.05);并在TRT中测得的VO2max达到了几乎具有统计学意义(p = 0.06)。 YIET中涵盖的距离与所有测得的VO2max值之间缺乏关联,这表明测得的VO2max本身可能不适合表征足球运动员的间歇耐力表现。与MST相比,YIET可能是对足球运动员耐力表现的更有利的基于领域的评估。要点 class =“ unordered” style =“ list-style-type:disc”> <!-list- behavior = unordered prefix-word = mark-type = disc max-label-size = 0-> Yo-Yo间歇耐力测试和20m多阶段穿梭跑测试都是对足球运动员进行有氧运动的有效措施 li> 测得的最大摄氧量(VO2max)本身可能不适合表征足球运动员的间歇耐力表现。 与MST相比,YIET可能是一种更有利于基于现场的足球运动员耐力评估性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号