首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Clinical Practice and Cases in Emergency Medicine >Life-threatening Vesicular Bronchial Injury Requiring Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Rescue in an Electronic Nicotine Delivery System User
【2h】

Life-threatening Vesicular Bronchial Injury Requiring Veno-venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Rescue in an Electronic Nicotine Delivery System User

机译:电子尼古丁传送系统用户中需要危及生命的水泡性支气管损伤需要静脉-静脉体外膜氧合作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) is increasing across the United States as tobacco bans increase and more people use these devices in an attempt to quit smoking. They are unregulated by the Food and Drug Administration, and there is significant concern that ENDS could produce several toxic byproducts.In this case a 35-year-old female presented to the emergency department with sudden-onset dyspnea. She denied current tobacco smoking, but she was a user of ENDS. When bronchoscopy was performed, an extensive pattern of suspected chemical injury was noted in her airways. She required transfer to a tertiary center where she required extracorporeal membranous oxygenation.Despite public opinion that ENDS are generally safe, or at least safer than tobacco smoking, contrary evidence is mounting. We postulate that her injuries were likely suffered secondary to use of an ENDS.
机译:随着烟草禁令的增加,电子尼古丁传送系统(ENDS)的使用在美国各地不断增加,并且越来越多的人尝试使用这些装置来戒烟。它们不受食品和药物管理局的管制,并且人们非常关注ENDS可能产生几种有毒的副产物。在这种情况下,一名35岁的女性因急症呼吸困难被送往急诊科。她否认目前吸烟,但她是电子烟ENDS的使用者。进行支气管镜检查时,在她的气道中发现了广泛的可疑化学损伤模式。她需要转移到第三级中心进行体外膜氧合作用。尽管公众认为电子尼古丁传送系统通常是安全的,或者至少比吸烟更安全,但相反的证据却越来越多。我们假设她的伤害很可能是由于使用电子尼古丁传送系统而遭受的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号