首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal >Robustness in experimental design: A study on the reliability of selection approaches
【2h】

Robustness in experimental design: A study on the reliability of selection approaches

机译:实验设计的稳健性:选择方法的可靠性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The quality criteria for experimental design approaches in chemoinformatics are numerous. Not only the error performance of a model resulting from the selected compounds is of importance, but also reliability, consistency, stability and robustness against small variations in the dataset or structurally diverse compounds. We developed a new stepwise, adaptive approach, DescRep, combining an iteratively refined descriptor selection with a sampling based on the putatively most representative compounds. A comparison of the proposed strategy was based on statistical performance of models derived from such a selection to those derived by other popular and frequently used approaches, such as the Kennard-Stone algorithm or the most descriptive compound selection. We used three datasets to carry out a statistical evaluation of the performance, reliability and robustness of the resulting models. Our results indicate that stepwise and adaptive approaches have a better adaptability to changes within a dataset and that this adaptability results in a better error performance and stability of the resulting models.
机译:化学信息学实验设计方法的质量标准很多。由所选化合物产生的模型的误差性能不仅很重要,而且对于数据集或结构上不同的化合物的微小变化,其可靠性,一致性,稳定性和鲁棒性也很重要。我们开发了一种新的逐步自适应方法DescRep,它结合了迭代精化的描述符选择和基于假定最有代表性的化合物的采样。所提议策略的比较是基于从这种选择得出的模型与通过其他流行和常用方法(例如Kennard-Stone算法或最具描述性的化合物选择)得出的模型的统计性能之间的比较。我们使用三个数据集对结果模型的性能,可靠性和鲁棒性进行了统计评估。我们的结果表明,逐步和自适应方法对数据集内的更改具有更好的适应性,并且这种适应性可导致更好的错误性能和所得模型的稳定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号