首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Critical Care >The ethical analysis of risk in intensive care unit research
【2h】

The ethical analysis of risk in intensive care unit research

机译:重症监护病房研究中的风险伦理分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Research in the intensive care unit (ICU) is commonly thought to pose 'serious risk' to study participants. This perception may be at the root of a variety of impediments to the conduct of clinical trials in the ICU setting. Component analysis offers a promising approach to the ethical analysis of ICU research. Because clinical trials commonly involve a mixture of study interventions, therapeutic and nontherapeutic procedures must be analyzed separately. Therapeutic procedures must meet the requirement of clinical equipoise. Risks associated with nontherapeutic procedures must be minimized consistent with sound scientific design, and be deemed reasonable in relation to the knowledge to be gained. When research involves a vulnerable population, such as adults incapable of providing informed consent, nontherapeutic risks are limited to a minor increase over minimal risk. Understood in this way, the incremental risk posed by participation in ICU research may be minimal. This realization has important implications for review by institutional review boards of such research and for the informed consent process.
机译:重症监护病房(ICU)的研究通常被认为会对研究参与者构成“严重风险”。这种认识可能是在ICU环境中进行临床试验的各种障碍的根源。成分分析为ICU研究的伦理分析提供了一种有前途的方法。由于临床试验通常涉及多种研究干预措施,因此必须分别分析治疗和非治疗程序。治疗程序必须符合临床平衡的要求。必须与合理的科学设计相一致地将与非治疗性程序相关的风险降至最低,并且相对于要获取的知识而言,该风险应被认为是合理的。当研究涉及弱势群体,例如无法提供知情同意的成年人时,非治疗风险仅限于最小风险之上的微小增加。以这种方式理解,参与ICU研究带来的增量风险可能很小。这种认识对于机构审查委员会对该研究的审查以及知情同意程序具有重要意义。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号