首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Current Cardiology Reviews >Thrombus Extraction Catheters vs. Angiojet Rheolytic Thrombectomy in Thrombotic Lesions/SV Grafts
【2h】

Thrombus Extraction Catheters vs. Angiojet Rheolytic Thrombectomy in Thrombotic Lesions/SV Grafts

机译:血栓形成导管/ SV移植中的血栓拔除导管与血管喷射溶栓术

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention, (pPCI), of native coronaries and saphenous vein grafts (SVGs), is the recommended reperfusion strategy for STEMI, and an early invasive approach is recommended for high risk patients with UA/NSTEMI. Although PCI effectively restores flow in the infarct related artery/culprit vessel in both situations, myocardial perfusion often remains suboptimal due to microvascular obstruction, partly attributed to distal embolization of thrombus. Hence, thrombectomy (manual or mechanical), prior to stenting may further reduce hard clinical end points in patients with ACS. This article discusses accumulated evidence regarding the safety and effectiveness of thrombectomy in culprit native coronaries and SVGs in such patients, as well as possible strategies for maximizing its benefits relative to the size of the thrombotic burden.
机译:推荐对原发性冠状动脉和大隐静脉移植物(SVG)进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(pPCI),是STEMI的推荐再灌注策略,对于UA / NSTEMI高危患者,建议采用早期侵入性治疗。尽管在两种情况下,PCI都能有效地恢复梗死相关的动脉/罪犯血管中的血流,但由于微血管阻塞(部分归因于血栓的远端栓塞),心肌灌注通常仍然欠佳。因此,在置入支架之前,血栓切除术(手动或机械)可进一步降低ACS患者的临床终点。本文讨论了有关在此类患者的罪魁祸首天然冠状动脉和SVG中进行血栓切除术的安全性和有效性的累积证据,以及相对于血栓负担的大小最大化其益处的可能策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号