首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Psychiatry >Income inequality and depression: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the association and a scoping review of mechanisms
【2h】

Income inequality and depression: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of the association and a scoping review of mechanisms

机译:收入不平等与抑郁:对协会的系统评价和荟萃分析以及对机制的范围界定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Most countries have witnessed a dramatic increase of income inequality in the past three decades. This paper addresses the question of whether income inequality is associated with the population prevalence of depression and, if so, the potential mechanisms and pathways which may explain this association. Our systematic review included 26 studies, mostly from high‐income countries. Nearly two‐thirds of all studies and five out of six longitudinal studies reported a statistically significant positive relationship between income inequality and risk of depression; only one study reported a statistically significant negative relationship. Twelve studies were included in a meta‐analysis with dichotomized inequality groupings. The pooled risk ratio was 1.19 (95% CI: 1.07‐1.31), demonstrating greater risk of depression in populations with higher income inequality relative to populations with lower inequality. Multiple studies reported subgroup effects, including greater impacts of income inequality among women and low‐income populations. We propose an ecological framework, with mechanisms operating at the national level (the neo‐material hypothesis), neighbourhood level (the social capital and the social comparison hypotheses) and individual level (psychological stress and social defeat hypotheses) to explain this association. We conclude that policy makers should actively promote actions to reduce income inequality, such as progressive taxation policies and a basic universal income. Mental health professionals should champion such policies, as well as promote the delivery of interventions which target the pathways and proximal determinants, such as building life skills in adolescents and provision of psychological therapies and packages of care with demonstrated effectiveness for settings of poverty and high income inequality.
机译:在过去的三十年中,大多数国家的收入不平等现象急剧增加。本文探讨了收入不平等是否与抑郁症的人口患病率有关,如果有的话,可能是解释这种联系的潜在机制和途径的问题。我们的系统评价包括26项研究,大部分来自高收入国家。在所有研究中,近三分之二和六项纵向研究中有五分之三报告说,收入不平等与抑郁风险之间存在显着的正相关。只有一项研究报告了统计学上显着的负相关。荟萃分析包括十二项研究,包括二等分的不平等分组。汇总风险比为1.19(95%CI:1.07-1.31),表明收入不平等较高的人群相对于收入不平等较低的人群患抑郁症的风险更大。多项研究报告了亚组效应,包括妇女和低收入人群收入不平等的更大影响。我们提出了一个生态框架,其机制在国家层面(新物质假设),邻里层面(社会资本和社会比较假设)和个人层面(心理压力和社会失败假设)运作,以解释这种联系。我们得出的结论是,决策者应积极促进减少收入不平等的行动,例如累进税收政策和基本全民收入。精神卫生专业人员应拥护此类政策,并促进针对这些途径和近端决定因素的干预措施的交付,例如建立青少年的生活技能,提供心理疗法和一揽子护理,以证明对贫困和高收入环境的有效性不等式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号