首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Continuous wound infusion of local anaesthetic agents following colorectal surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Continuous wound infusion of local anaesthetic agents following colorectal surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:大肠手术后连续伤口局部麻醉药的输注:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To provide a specific review and meta-analysis of the available evidence for continuous wound infusion of local anaesthetic agents following midline laparotomy for major colorectal surgery.METHODS: Medline, Embase, trial registries, conference proceedings and article reference lists were searched to identify randomised, controlled trials of continuous wound infusion of local anaesthetic agents following colorectal surgery. The primary outcomes were opioid consumption, pain visual analogue scores (VASs), return to bowel function and length of hospital stay. Weighted mean difference were calculated for continuous outcomes.RESULTS: Five trials containing 542 laparotomy wounds were eligible for inclusion. There was a significant decrease in post-operative pain VAS at rest on day 3 (weighted mean difference: -0.43; 95% CI: -0.81 to -0.04; P = 0.03) but not on post-operative day 1 and 2. Local anaesthetic infusion was associated with a significant reduction in pain VAS on movement on all three post-operative days (day 1 weighted mean difference: -1.14; 95% CI: -2.24 to -0.041; P = 0.04, day 2 weighted mean difference: -0.97, 95% CI: -1.91 to -0.029; P = 0.04, day 3 weighted mean difference: -0.61; 95% CI: 1.01 to -0.20; P = 0.0038). Local anaesthetic wound infusion was associated with a significant decrease in total opioid consumption (weighted mean difference: -40.13; 95% CI: -76.74 to -3.53; P = 0.03). There was no significant decrease in length of stay (weighted mean difference: -20.87; 95% CI: -46.96 to 5.21; P = 0.12) or return of bowel function (weighted mean difference: -9.40; 95% CI: -33.98 to 15.17; P = 0.45).CONCLUSION: The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that local anaesthetic wound infusion following laparotomy for major colorectal surgery is a promising technique but do not provide conclusive evidence of benefit. Further research is required including cost-effectiveness analysis.
机译:目的:对中线剖腹大肠癌手术后连续输注局部麻醉剂的可用证据进行具体回顾和荟萃分析。方法:检索Medline,Embase,试验注册,会议记录和文章参考清单结直肠手术后连续伤口输注局部麻醉剂的随机对照试验。主要结局为阿片类药物的消费,疼痛视觉模拟评分(VAS),肠功能恢复和住院时间。结果:加权平均差为连续的结果进行了计算。结果:五项试验包含542例剖腹手术伤口,符合纳入条件。第3天休息时术后疼痛VAS显着降低(加权平均差异:-0.43; 95%CI:-0.81至-0.04; P = 0.03),但在术后第1和2天则没有。麻醉输注与术后三天的运动时疼痛VAS显着降低有关(第1天加权平均差:-1.14; 95%CI:-2.24至-0.041; P = 0.04,第2天加权平均差: -0.97,95%CI:-1.91至-0.029; P = 0.04,第3天加权平均差:-0.61; 95%CI:1.01至-0.20; P = 0.0038)。局部麻醉药伤口输注与总阿片类药物消耗量显着减少有关(加权平均差异:-40.13; 95%CI:-76.74至-3.53; P = 0.03)。住院时间(加权平均差异:-20.87; 95%CI:-46.96至5.21; P = 0.12)或肠功能恢复(加权平均差异:-9.40; 95%CI:-33.98至结论:这项系统评价和荟萃分析的结果表明,大肠直肠癌剖腹手术后局部麻醉伤口输注是一种有前途的技术,但并未提供确凿的证据。15.17; P = 0.45)。需要进一步的研究,包括成本效益分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号