首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Gastroenterology >Comparative clinical trial of S-pantoprazole versus racemic pantoprazole in the treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease
【2h】

Comparative clinical trial of S-pantoprazole versus racemic pantoprazole in the treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease

机译:S-pan托拉唑与消旋pan托拉唑治疗胃食管反流病的对比临床试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of S-pantoprazole (20 mg once a day) versus racemic Pantoprazole (40 mg once a day) in the treatment of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD).METHODS: This multi-centre, randomized, double-blind clinical trial consisted of 369 patients of either sex suffering from GERD. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either one tablet (20 mg) of S-pantoprazole once a day (test group) or 40 mg racemic pantoprazole once a day (reference group) for 28 d. Patients were evaluated for reduction in baseline on d 0, GERD symptom score on d 14 and 28, occurrence of any adverse effect during the course of therapy. Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy was performed in 54 patients enrolled at one of the study centers at baseline and on d 28.RESULTS: Significant reduction in the scores (mean and median) for heart burn (P < 0.0001), acid regurgitation (P < 0.0001), bloating (P < 0.0001), nausea (P < 0.0001) and dysphagia (P < 0.001) was achieved in both groups on d 14 with further reduction on continuing the therapy till 28 d. There was a statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients showing improvement in acid regurgitation and bloating on d 14 and 28 (P = 0.004 for acid regurgitation; P = 0.03 for bloating) and heart burn on d 28 (P = 0.01) between the two groups, with a higher proportion in the test group than in the reference group. Absolute risk reductions for heartburn/acid regurgitation/bloating were approximately 15% on d 14 and 10% on d 28. The relative risk reductions were 26%-33% on d 14 and 15% on d 28. GI endoscopy showed no significant difference in healing of esophagitis (P = 1) and gastric erosions (P = 0.27) between the two groups. None of the patients in either group reported any adverse effect during the course of therapy.CONCLUSION: In GERD, S-pantoprazole (20 mg) is more effective than racemic pantoprazole (40 mg) in improving symptoms of heartburn, acid regurgitation, bloating and equally effective in healing esophagitis and gastric erosions. The relative risk reduction is 15%-33%. Both drugs are safe and well tolerated.
机译:目的:比较S-pan托拉唑(每天一次20 mg)和消旋Pan托拉唑(每天40 mg)在治疗胃食管反流病(GERD)中的功效和耐受性。方法:该多中心,随机,这项双盲临床试验包括369名患有GERD的男女患者。随机分配患者接受28 d每天一次的片剂(20 mg)S-pan托拉唑(测试组)或每天一次接受40 mg外消旋pan托拉唑(参考组)。在第0天评估患者基线是否降低,在第14天和28天评估GERD症状评分,以及在治疗过程中是否出现任何不良反应。在基线和第28天在其中一个研究中心招募的54例患者进行了胃肠道(GI)内镜检查。结果:心脏灼伤(P <0.0001),胃酸反流(P <两组均在第14天达到腹胀(P <0.0001),恶心(P <0.0001)和吞咽困难(P <0.001),并在继续治疗至28 d时进一步降低。在第14天和第28天,显示酸反流和腹胀改善的患者比例(统计学上为P = 0.004;对于腹胀为P = 0.03)和在第28天出现胃灼热的患者比例(P = 0.01)存在统计学差异。两组,测试组的比例高于参考组。胃灼热/反酸/腹胀的绝对危险度在第14天降低约15%,在第28天降低约10%。第14天相对危险度降低约26%-33%,在第28天降低约15%。胃肠镜检查无明显差异两组之间在食管炎(P = 1)和胃糜烂(P = 0.27)愈合方面的差异。结论:在GERD中,S-pan托拉唑(20 mg)比消旋pan托拉唑(40 mg)在改善胃灼热,反酸,腹胀和腹泻症状方面更有效。在治疗食道炎和胃糜烂方面同样有效。相对风险降低为15%-33%。两种药物都是安全且耐受性良好的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号