首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Psychiatry >Peritraumatic Behavior Questionnaire - Observer Rated: Validation of the objective version of a measure for combat-related peritraumatic stress
【2h】

Peritraumatic Behavior Questionnaire - Observer Rated: Validation of the objective version of a measure for combat-related peritraumatic stress

机译:围创伤行为调查表-观察者评分:确认与战斗有关的围创伤压力的客观指标

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

AIM: To validate the first third-person-rated measure assessing combat-related peritraumatic stress symptoms and evaluate its psychometric properties and war-zone applicability.METHODS: The valid assessment of peritraumatic symptoms in the theater of military operations represents a significant challenge in combat-related, mental health research, which mainly relies on retrospective, subjective self-report ratings. This longitudinal observational study used data from actively deployed troops to correlate third-person observer ratings of deployment peritraumatic behaviors [Peritraumatic Behavior Questionnaire - Observer Rated (PBQ-OR)] collected on a bi-monthly basis with post-deployment (1-wk follow-up) ratings of the previously validated PBQ self-rate version (PBQ-SR), and (3-mo follow-up) clinician assessed and self-report posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms (Clinician Administered PTSD Scale, PTSD Checklist). Cronbach’s alpha (α) and correlation coefficients were calculated to assess internal reliability and concurrent validity respectively.RESULTS: Eight hundred and sixty male Marines were included in this study after signing informed consents at pre-deployment (mean age 23.2 ± 2.6 years). Although our findings were limited by an overall sparse return rate of PBQ-OR ratings, the main results indicate satisfactory psychometric properties with good internal consistency for the PBQ-OR (α = 0.88) and high convergent and concurrent validity with 1-wk post-deployment PBQ-SR ratings and 3-mo posttraumatic stress symptoms. Overall, later PBQ-OR report date was associated with higher correlation between PBQ-OR and post-deployment measures. Kappa analysis between PBQ-OR and PBQ-SR single items, showed best agreement in questions relating of mortal peril, desire for revenge, and experience of intense physical reactions. Logistic regression demonstrated satisfactory predictive validity of PBQ-OR total score with respect to PTSD caseness (OR = 1.0513; 95%CI: 1.011-1.093; P = 0.02).CONCLUSION: Since no comparable tools have been developed, PBQ-OR could be valuable as real-time screening tool for earlier detection of Service Members at risk.
机译:目的:验证第一个以第三人称评定的评估与战斗有关的创伤性应激症状的措施,并评估其心理计量学特性和战区适用性。方法:在军事行动区对创伤性症状的有效评估是作战中的重大挑战相关的心理健康研究,主要依靠回顾性,主观自我报告评分。这项纵向观察性研究使用了来自积极部署部队的数据,将每两个月收集一次的部署后创伤行为的第三人称观察者评分与[部署后行为(调查后,观察者评分(PBQ-OR)])相关联,并将其与部署后的行为进行了关联(1-wk -up)先前验证的PBQ自评量表(PBQ-SR)的评分,以及(3-mo随访)临床医生评估和自我报告的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状(临床医生管理的PTSD量表,PTSD检查表) 。结果:分别计算了八百六十名海军陆战队员在部署前签署的知情同意书(平均年龄23.2±2.6岁),以评估内部信度和同时效度。尽管我们的研究结果受到PBQ-OR评分总体稀疏回报率的限制,但主要结果表明,令人满意的心理测量特性具有良好的PBQ-OR内部一致性(α= 0.88),并且收敛性和并发有效性较高,发生后1周-部署PBQ-SR等级和创伤后3个月应激症状。总体而言,以后的PBQ-OR报告日期与PBQ-OR和部署后措施之间的相关性更高。 PBQ-OR和PBQ-SR单个项目之间的Kappa分析显示,在致命危险,复仇欲望和强烈的身体反应等问题上,一致性最高。 Logistic回归显示PBQ-OR总分相对于PTSD病例的预测性令人满意(OR = 1.0513; 95%CI:1.011-1.093; P = 0.02)。结论:由于尚未开发出可比较的工具,PBQ-OR可以作为作为实时筛查工具非常有价值,可以及早发现有风险的服务成员。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号