首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B >Comparison of 1.5 lidocaine and 0.5 ropivacaine epidural anesthesia combined with propofol general anesthesia guided by bispectral index
【2h】

Comparison of 1.5 lidocaine and 0.5 ropivacaine epidural anesthesia combined with propofol general anesthesia guided by bispectral index

机译:双光谱指数指导的1.5%利多卡因和0.5%罗哌卡因硬膜外麻醉联合丙泊酚全麻的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective: To compare the effects of epidural anesthesia with 1.5% lidocaine and 0.5% ropivacaine on propofol requirements, the time to loss of consciousness (LOC), effect-site propofol concentrations, and the hemodynamic variables during induction of general anesthesia guided by bispectral index (BIS) were studied. Methods: Forty-five patients were divided into three groups to receive epidurally administered saline (Group S), 1.5% (w/w) lidocaine (Group L), or 0.5% (w/w) ropivacaine (Group R). Propofol infusion was started to produce blood concentration of 4 μg/ml. Once the BIS value reached 40~50, endotracheal intubation was facilitated by 0.1 mg/kg vecuronium. Measurements included the time to LOC, effect-site propofol concentrations, total propofol dose, mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), and heart rate (HR) at different study time points. Results: During induction of anesthesia, both Groups L and R were similar for the time to LOC, effect-site propofol concentrations, total propofol dose, MABP, HR, and BIS. The total doses of propofol administered until 1 min post-intubation were significantly less in patients of Groups R and L compared with Group S. MABP and HR were significantly lower following propofol induction compared with baseline values in the three groups, or MABP was significantly increased following intubation as compared with that prior to intubation in Group S but not in Groups R and L while HR was significantly increased following intubation in the three groups. Conclusion: Epidural anesthesia with 1.5% lidocaine and 0.5% ropivacaine has similar effects on the time to LOC, effect-site propofol concentrations, total propofol dose, and the hemodynamic variables during induction of general anesthesia.
机译:目的:比较硬膜外麻醉联合1.5%利多卡因和0.5%罗哌卡因对异丙酚需求量,意识丧失时间(LOC),作用部位丙泊酚浓度以及双光谱指数指导的全身麻醉诱导期间血流动力学变量的影响。 (BIS)进行了研究。方法:将45例患者分为三组,分别接受硬膜外给药盐水(S组),1.5%(w / w)利多卡因(L组)或0.5%(w / w)罗哌卡因(R组)。开始输注异丙酚可产生4μg/ ml的血液浓度。一旦BIS值达到40〜50,0.1 mg / kg维库溴铵可促进气管插管。测量包括在不同研究时间点的LOC时间,作用部位丙泊酚浓度,丙泊酚总剂量,平均动脉压(MABP)和心率(HR)。结果:在麻醉诱导期间,L组和R组在时间上,LOC,作用部位丙泊酚浓度,丙泊酚总剂量,MABP,HR和BIS相似。与S组相比,R和L组患者在插管后1分钟之前给予的异丙酚总剂量明显少于S组。与三组基线值相比,丙泊酚诱导后的MABP和HR显着降低,或者MABP显着增加与S组插管前相比,R组和L组与插管后相比,三组插管后HR显着增加。结论:采用1.5%利多卡因和0.5%罗哌卡因的硬膜外麻醉对全身麻醉诱导的LOC时间,作用部位丙泊酚浓度,丙泊酚总剂量以及血液动力学变量具有相似的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号