首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>World Journal of Cardiology >Importance of a second spasm provocation test: Four cases with an initial negative spasm provocation test
【2h】

Importance of a second spasm provocation test: Four cases with an initial negative spasm provocation test

机译:进行第二次痉挛激发试验的重要性:四例初始痉挛激发试验为阴性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The spasm provocation test (SPT) is an important test in the diagnosis of vasospastic angina (VSA). In many cases, this test is performed as the gold standard test, and VSA is considered not present if the SPT is negative. However, some patients continue to experience chest symptoms despite a negative SPT. In this study, we report four cases in which SPT was repeated to evaluate chest symptoms despite the negative results of the first SPT. Two men in their 70s, one woman in her 60s, and one woman in her 70s, all with chest symptoms, underwent a second SPT at 4, 3, 2, and 3 years, respectively, after the first SPT, which was negative. Three patients had positive results in the second SPT (75%). In conclusion, even when SPT is negative, the diagnosis of VSA should be made with clinical symptoms in consideration. In some cases, a second SPT may be required to confirm the diagnosis of VSA.
机译:痉挛激发试验(SPT)是诊断血管痉挛性心绞痛(VSA)的重要试验。在许多情况下,此测试作为金标准测试执行,并且如果SPT为负,则认为VSA不存在。然而,尽管SPT阴性,一些患者仍会继续出现胸部症状。在这项研究中,我们报告了4例病例,尽管第一个SPT阴性,但仍重复SPT评估胸部症状。在第一次SPT呈阴性后的第4、3、2和3年,分别有胸部症状的70多岁的两名男性,60多岁的一名女性和70多岁的一名女性分别接受了第二次SPT,这是阴性的。在第二次SPT中有3例患者阳性(75%)。总之,即使SPT阴性,也应考虑临床症状进行VSA的诊断。在某些情况下,可能需要第二个SPT来确认VSA的诊断。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号