首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Trends in Hearing >Lexical-Access Ability and Cognitive Predictors of Speech Recognition in Noise in Adult Cochlear Implant Users
【2h】

Lexical-Access Ability and Cognitive Predictors of Speech Recognition in Noise in Adult Cochlear Implant Users

机译:成年人工耳蜗植入用户噪声中的词汇访问能力和语音识别的认知预测因子

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Not all of the variance in speech-recognition performance of cochlear implant (CI) users can be explained by biographic and auditory factors. In normal-hearing listeners, linguistic and cognitive factors determine most of speech-in-noise performance. The current study explored specifically the influence of visually measured lexical-access ability compared with other cognitive factors on speech recognition of 24 postlingually deafened CI users. Speech-recognition performance was measured with monosyllables in quiet (consonant-vowel-consonant [CVC]), sentences-in-noise (SIN), and digit-triplets in noise (DIN). In addition to a composite variable of lexical-access ability (LA), measured with a lexical-decision test (LDT) and word-naming task, vocabulary size, working-memory capacity (Reading Span test [RSpan]), and a visual analogue of the SIN test (text reception threshold test) were measured. The DIN test was used to correct for auditory factors in SIN thresholds by taking the difference between SIN and DIN: SRTdiff. Correlation analyses revealed that duration of hearing loss (dHL) was related to SIN thresholds. Better working-memory capacity was related to SIN and SRTdiff scores. LDT reaction time was positively correlated with SRTdiff scores. No significant relationships were found for CVC or DIN scores with the predictor variables. Regression analyses showed that together with dHL, RSpan explained 55% of the variance in SIN thresholds. When controlling for auditory performance, LA, LDT, and RSpan separately explained, together with dHL, respectively 37%, 36%, and 46% of the variance in SRTdiff outcome. The results suggest that poor verbal working-memory capacity and to a lesser extent poor lexical-access ability limit speech-recognition ability in listeners with a CI.
机译:并非所有的人工耳蜗植入(CI)用户的语音识别性能差异都可以通过传记和听觉因素来解释。在听力正常的听众中,语言和认知因素决定了大部分的“有声说话”表现。当前的研究专门探讨了视觉测量的词汇访问能力与其他认知因素相比对24位耳聋后CI用户的语音识别的影响。语音识别性能是在安静的单音节(辅音-元音-辅音[CVC]),有声句子(SIN)和噪声中的数字三胞胎(DIN)下测量的。除了词汇访问能力(LA)的复合变量之外,还可以通过词汇决策测试(LDT)和单词命名任务,词汇量,工作记忆能力(阅读跨度测试[RSpan])和视觉测量了SIN测试(文本接收阈值测试)的类似物。通过获取SIN和DIN之间的差异:SRTdiff,使用DIN测试校正SIN阈值中的听觉因素。相关分析表明,听力损失(dHL)的持续时间与SIN阈值有关。更好的工作记忆能力与SIN和SRTdiff分数有关。 LDT反应时间与SRTdiff评分呈正相关。没有发现CVC或DIN得分与预测变量有显着关系。回归分析表明,RSpan与dHL一起解释了SIN阈值的55%的方差。当控制听觉表现时,LA,LDT和RSpan以及dHL分别解释了SRTdiff结果差异的37%,36%和46%。结果表明,较差的语言工作记忆能力和较弱的词汇访问能力会限制具有CI的听众的语音识别能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号