首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Tobacco Control >Reducing social inequalities in smoking: can evidence inform policy? A pilot study
【2h】

Reducing social inequalities in smoking: can evidence inform policy? A pilot study

机译:减少吸烟中的社会不平等:证据能为政策提供依据吗?初步研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Data source: The Cochrane Library (2002/4). >Study selection: Systematic reviews of the effectiveness of community based tobacco control interventions, and all the primary studies included in one of these reviews. >Data extraction: Reviews and primary studies were assessed for intent to assess the social distribution of intervention effects, information about the social inclusiveness or targeting of interventions, baseline sociodemographic data collected on participants, and estimates of effect size stratified by sociodemographic variables. >Data synthesis: Only one review aimed to examine outcomes stratified by sex, age or socioeconomic status, and these aims were only achieved with respect to sex. Sociodemographic data about participants were frequently collected in primary studies, but not used to compare intervention effects between social groups. >Conclusions: There may be scope for using existing research more effectively to contribute to evidence based policy to reduce social inequalities in smoking—by explicitly seeking stratified outcome data in new systematic reviews, by re-analysing original datasets, and/or by meta-analysis of individual participant data.
机译:>数据来源: Cochrane库(2002/4)。 >研究选择:基于社区的烟草控制干预措施有效性的系统评价,其中所有主要研究均包含在其中。 >数据提取:对评论和基础研究进行了评估,目的是评估干预效果的社会分布,干预措施的社会包容性或针对性的信息,参与者的基本社会人口统计学数据以及分层的效果估计通过社会人口统计学变量。 >数据综合:只有一项评论旨在检查按性别,年龄或社会经济状况分层的结果,而这些目标仅在性别方面实现。有关参与者的社会人口统计学数据经常在基础研究中收集,但没有用于比较社会群体之间的干预效果。 >结论:通过在新的系统评价中明确地寻找分层结果数据,重新分析原始数据集,和/或通过对单个参与者数据的荟萃分析。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号