首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Systematic Reviews >Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of orthodontic mini-implants in clinical practice: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Barriers and facilitators to the implementation of orthodontic mini-implants in clinical practice: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:在临床实践中实施正畸微型植入物的障碍和促进者:系统评价和荟萃分析的方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BackgroundMost orthodontic treatment plans need some form of anchorage to control the reciprocal forces of tooth movement. Orthodontic mini implants (OMIs) have been hailed for having revolutionized orthodontics, because they provide anchorage without depending on the collaboration of patients, they have a favorable effectiveness compared with conventional anchorage devices, and they can be used for a wide scale of treatment objectives. However, surveys have shown that many orthodontists never or rarely use them. To understand the rationale behind this knowledge-to-action gap, we will conduct a systematic review that will identify and quantify potential barriers and facilitators to the implementation of OMIs in clinical practice for all potential stakeholders, i.e., patients, family members, clinicians, office staff, clinic owners, policy makers, etc. The prevalence of clinicians that do not use OMIs will be our secondary outcome.
机译:背景技术大多数正畸治疗计划都需要某种形式的锚固来控制牙齿运动的相互作用力。正畸微型植入物(OMI)因彻底改变了正畸技术而倍受赞誉,因为它们无需依赖患者的协作即可提供锚固作用,与传统的锚固装置相比具有良好的疗效,并且可以用于广泛的治疗目的。但是,调查显示,许多牙齿矫正医生从不使用或很少使用它们。为了解这种知识与行动之间的差距的原因,我们将进行系统的审查,以发现和量化所有潜在利益相关者(例如患者,家庭成员,临床医生,办公室工作人员,诊所所有者,政策制定者等。不使用OMI的临床医生的普遍存在将是我们的第二结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号