首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Standards in Genomic Sciences >RCN4GSC Workshop Report: Modeling a Testbed for Managing Data at the Interface of Biodiversity and (Meta)Genomics April 2011
【2h】

RCN4GSC Workshop Report: Modeling a Testbed for Managing Data at the Interface of Biodiversity and (Meta)Genomics April 2011

机译:RCN4GSC研讨会报告:在生物多样性和(Meta)Genomics界面上管理数据的测试平台建模2011年4月

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

At the GSC11 meeting (4-6 April 2011, Hinxton, England, the GSC’s genomic biodiversity working group (GBWG) developed an initial model for a data management testbed at the interface of biodiversity with genomics and metagenomics. With representatives of the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) participating, it was agreed that the most useful course of action would be for GBIF to collaborate with the GSC in its ongoing GBWG workshops to achieve common goals around interoperability/data integration across (meta)-genomic and species level data. It was determined that a quick comparison should be made of the contents of the Darwin Core (DwC) and the GSC data checklists, with a goal of determining their degree of overlap and compatibility. An ad-hoc task group lead by Renzo Kottman and Peter Dawyndt undertook an initial comparison between the Darwin Core (DwC) standard used by the Global Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) and the MIxS checklists put forward by the Genomic Standards Consortium (GSC). A term-by-term comparison showed that DwC and GSC concepts complement each other far more than they compete with each other. Because the preliminary analysis done at this meeting was based on expertise with GSC standards, but not with DwC standards, the group recommended that a joint meeting of DwC and GSC experts be convened as soon as possible to continue this joint assessment and to propose additional work going forward.
机译:在2011年4月4日至6日在英国欣克斯顿举行的GSC11会议上,GSC的基因组生物多样性工作组(GBWG)开发了一个初始数据模型,用于在生物多样性与基因组学和宏基因组学的接口上进行数据管理测试。在参与机构(GBIF)的情况下,人们一致认为,最有用的行动方案是让GBIF与GSC在正在进行的GBWG研讨会上进行合作,以实现围绕(元)基因组和物种水平数据的互操作性/数据集成的共同目标。 Renzo Kottman和Peter领导的特设任务组已确定,应该对Darwin Core(DwC)和GSC数据清单的内容进行快速比较,以确定它们的重叠程度和兼容性。 Dawyndt对全球生物多样性信息基金(GBIF)使用的达尔文核心(DwC)标准与基因组学提出的MIxS清单进行了初步比较。标准协会(GSC)。逐项比较表明,DwC和GSC概念彼此互补,远远超过了彼此竞争的程度。由于在本次会议上进行的初步分析是基于GSC标准而非DwC标准的专业知识,因此该小组建议尽快召开DwC和GSC专家的联席会议,以继续进行此项联合评估并提出其他工作向前走。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号