首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>SSM - Population Health >Is model of care associated with infant birth outcomes among vulnerable women? A scoping review of midwifery-led versus physician-led care
【2h】

Is model of care associated with infant birth outcomes among vulnerable women? A scoping review of midwifery-led versus physician-led care

机译:照顾模式是否与弱势妇女的婴儿出生结局有关?助产士主导与医师主导的护理范围界定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This scoping review investigates if, over the last 25 years in high resource countries, midwives’ patients of low socioeconomic position (SEP) were at more or less risk of adverse infant birth outcomes compared to physicians’ patients. Reviewers identified 917 records in a search of 12 databases, grey literature, and citation lists. Thirty-one full documents were assessed and nine studies met inclusion criteria. Eight studies were assessed as moderate in quality; one study was given a weak rating. Of the moderate quality studies, the majority found no statistical difference in outcomes according to model of care for preterm birth, low or very low birth weight, or NICU admission. No study reported a statistically significant difference for small for gestational age birth (2 studies), or mean or low Apgar score (4 studies). However, one study found a reduced risk of preterm birth (AOR=0.70, p<0.01), and heavier mean infant birth weight (3325 g vs. 3282 g, p<0.01) for midwifery patients. Another study reported lower risk of low (RR=0.59, 95% CI: 0.46, 0.73) and very low birthweight (RR=0.44, 95% CI: 0.23, 0.85) for midwifery care. And, a third study reported a decrease in stays (1–3 days) in NICU (Adjusted Risk Difference=−1.8, 95% CI: −3.9, 0.2) for midwifery patients, though no overall difference in NICU admission of any duration. Other studies reported significant differences favoring midwifery care for mean birth weight (3598 g vs. 3407.3 g, p<0.05; 3233 g vs. 3089 g, p<0.05; 2 studies) and very low birth weight (OR=0.35, 95% CI:0.1, 0.9), for sub-groups within the larger study populations. This scoping review documented heterogeneity in study designs and analytical methods, inconsistent findings, moderate methodological quality, and lack of currency. There is a need for new studies to definitively establish if and how a midwifery-led model of care influences birth outcomes for women of low SEP.
机译:这项界定范围的调查调查了在过去25年中,在资源丰富的国家中,与医生的患者相比,社会经济地位低下(SEP)的助产士患者是否有或多或少的不良婴儿出生结局风险。审阅者在对12个数据库,灰色文献和引用列表的搜索中确定了917条记录。评估了31份完整文件,其中9项研究符合纳入标准。八项研究的质量评估为中等;一项研究的评级很差。在中等质量的研究中,根据早产,低出生体重或极低出生体重或新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的照护模式,大多数研究结果没有统计学差异。没有研究报告胎龄小(2项研究),平均或低Apgar评分(4项研究)的统计学差异。但是,一项研究发现,助产士患者的早产风险降低(AOR = 0.70,p <0.01),婴儿平均出生体重更重(3325 g vs.3282 g,p <0.01)。另一项研究报告说,助产士护理的低风险(RR = 0.59,95%CI:0.46,0.73)和极低出生体重(RR = 0.44,95%CI:0.23,0.85)较低。而且,第三项研究报告说,助产士患者重症监护病房的住院时间(1-3天)减少(调整后的风险差异= -1.8,95%CI:-3.9,0.2),尽管在任何持续时间的新生儿重症监护病房入院没有总体差异。其他研究表明,平均出生体重(3598 g对3407.3 g,p <0.05; 3233 g对3089 g,p <0.05; 2个研究)和极低出生体重(助产士护理)的助产士护理存在显着差异(OR = 0.35,95% CI:0.1,0.9),适用于较大研究人群中的亚组。这项范围界定的审查记录了研究设计和分析方法的异质性,不一致的发现,适度的方法学质量以及缺乏货币。有必要进行新的研究以明确确定由助产士主导的护理模式是否以及如何影响低SEP妇女的出生结局。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号