首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sports >Comparative Analysis of Load Profile between Small-Sided Games and Official Matches in Youth Soccer Players
【2h】

Comparative Analysis of Load Profile between Small-Sided Games and Official Matches in Youth Soccer Players

机译:青少年足球运动员小比赛与正式比赛负荷分布的比较分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purposes of the present study are: (a) to characterize the external (eTL) and internal load (iTL) of official matches and small-sided games (SSGs) in relation to their objective, (b) to compare demands between SSG, and (c) to analyze the SSG requirements in relation to official matches during a one-month competition period. Twenty under-18 national-level soccer players were recorded using WIMUTM inertial devices (RealTrack Systems, Almeria, Spain) during four official matches and 12 training sessions where four SSGs with different objectives were performed: (SSG1) keeping the ball; (SSG2) keeping the ball and progressing; (SSG3) keeping the ball, progressing and ending in mini-goals; and (SSG4) keeping the ball, progressing and ending in an official goal with a goalkeeper. Statistical analysis included Kruskall-Wallis’ H and Mann-Whitney’s U with Cohen’s d effect size. The SSGs presented walking and jogging intensity movements (0.7–7 to 7–14 km/h), with a 5-to-8 %HIA (high intensity activity, >16 km/h), where low intensity accelerations, decelerations and impacts were predominant (1–2.5 m/s2; 5–7 G), and %HRMAX (maximum heart rate percentage) was between 70–90%. Only SSG4 presented similar demands to competition, finding differences between SSGs (p < 0.05; d = 1.40 − 0.36). In conclusion, the objective of the SSGs directly influenced the demands on the players in training sessions. For this reason, it is important to monitor demands for designing specific training sessions.
机译:本研究的目的是:(a)根据目标确定正式比赛和小型比赛(SSG)的外部(eTL)和内部负荷(iTL);(b)比较SSG之间的需求, (c)在为期一个月的比赛期间,分析与官方比赛有关的SSG要求。在四场正式比赛和12场训练期间,使用WIMU TM 惯性设备(RealTrack Systems,西班牙阿尔梅里亚)记录了20位18岁以下的国家/地区足球运动员,其中进行了四个目标不同的SSG:(SSG1 )保持球; (SSG2)保持控球并不断进步; (SSG3)在迷你进球中保持控球,进步和终结; (SSG4)与守门员保持球,前进并以正式进球结束。统计分析包括Kruskall-Wallis的H和Mann-Whitney的U,以及Cohen的效果大小。 SSG呈现步行和慢跑强度运动(0.7–7至7–14 km / h),HIA为5%至8%(高强度活动,> 16 km / h),其中低强度加速度,减速度和冲击力占主导地位(1–2.5 m / s 2 ; 5–7 G),%HRMAX(最大心率百分比)在70–90%之间。只有SSG4对竞争提出了相似的要求,发现SSG之间存在差异(p <0.05; d = 1.40-0.36)。总之,SSG的目标直接影响了训练课程中对运动员的需求。因此,监视设计特定培训课程的需求非常重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号