首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sports >Similar Strength and Power Adaptations between Two Different Velocity-Based Training Regimens in Collegiate Female Volleyball Players
【2h】

Similar Strength and Power Adaptations between Two Different Velocity-Based Training Regimens in Collegiate Female Volleyball Players

机译:高校女排运动员基于速度的两种不同训练方案之间的相似强度和功率适应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigated the effects of two different velocity-based training (VBT) regimens on muscular adaptations. Fifteen female college volleyball players were randomly assigned into either progressive velocity-based training (PVBT) or optimum training load (OTL). Both groups trained three times a week for seven weeks. PVBT performed a 4-week strength block (e.g., 0.55–0.70 m·s−1) followed by a 3-week power block (e.g., 0.85–1.0 m·s−1), whereas OTL performed training at ~0.85–0.9 m·s−1. 1RM and peak power output (PP) assessments on the back squat (BS), bench press (BP) and deadlift (DL) exercises were assessed pre and post training. There was a main time effect (p ≤ 0.05) for BS and BP 1RM, (PVBT: 19.6%, ES: 1.72; OTL: 18.3%, ES: 1.57) and (PVBT: 8.5%, ES: 0.58; OTL: 10.2%, ES: 0.72), respectively. OTL increased DL 1RM to a greater extent than PVBT (p ≤ 0.05), (OTL: 22.9%, ES: 1.49; PVBT: 10.9%, ES: 0.88). Lastly, there was a main time effect (p ≤ 0.05) for BS, BP and DL PP, (PVBT: 18.3%, ES: 0.86; OTL: 19.8%, ES: 0.79); (PVBT: 14.5%, ES: 0.81; OTL: 27.9%, ES: 1.68); (PVBT: 15.7%, ES: 1.32; OTL: 20.1%, ES: 1.77) respectively. Our data suggest that both VBT regimens are effective for improving muscular performance in college volleyball players during the offseason period.
机译:这项研究调查了两种不同的基于速度的训练(VBT)方案对肌肉适应的影响。 15名女大学生排球运动员被随机分配到基于渐进速度的训练(PVBT)或最佳训练负荷(OTL)中。两组都每周训练3次,共7周。 PVBT进行了4周的力量训练(例如0.55-0.70 m·s -1 ),随后进行了3周的力量训练(例如0.85-1.0 m·s -1 / sup>),而OTL在约0.85–0.9 m·s -1 进行训练。在训练前后,对后蹲(BS),卧推(BP)和硬拉(DL)锻炼的1RM和峰值功率输出(PP)进行评估。 BS和BP 1RM有一个主要的时间效应(p≤0.05),(PVBT:19.6%,ES:1.72; OTL:18.3%,ES:1.57)和(PVBT:8.5%,ES:0.58; OTL:10.2) %,ES:0.72)。 OTL比PVBT增加DL 1RM的程度更大(p≤0.05),(OTL:22.9%,ES:1.49; PVBT:10.9%,ES:0.88)。最后,BS,BP和DL PP有一个主要的时间效应(p≤0.05)(PVBT:18.3%,ES:0.86; OTL:19.8%,ES:0.79); (PVBT:14.5%,ES:0.81; OTL:27.9%,ES:1.68); (PVBT:15.7%,ES:1.32; OTL:20.1%,ES:1.77)。我们的数据表明,在休赛期,两种VBT方案均可有效改善大学排球运动员的肌肉表现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号