首页> 外文OA文献 >Similar Strength and Power Adaptations between Two Different Velocity-Based Training Regimens in Collegiate Female Volleyball Players
【2h】

Similar Strength and Power Adaptations between Two Different Velocity-Based Training Regimens in Collegiate Female Volleyball Players

机译:大学女排训练中的两种不同速度培训方案之间的类似强度和功率适应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study investigated the effects of two different velocity-based training (VBT) regimens on muscular adaptations. Fifteen female college volleyball players were randomly assigned into either progressive velocity-based training (PVBT) or optimum training load (OTL). Both groups trained three times a week for seven weeks. PVBT performed a 4-week strength block (e.g., 0.55⁻0.70 m·s−1) followed by a 3-week power block (e.g., 0.85⁻1.0 m·s−1), whereas OTL performed training at ~0.85⁻0.9 m·s−1. 1RM and peak power output (PP) assessments on the back squat (BS), bench press (BP) and deadlift (DL) exercises were assessed pre and post training. There was a main time effect (p ≤ 0.05) for BS and BP 1RM, (PVBT: 19.6%, ES: 1.72; OTL: 18.3%, ES: 1.57) and (PVBT: 8.5%, ES: 0.58; OTL: 10.2%, ES: 0.72), respectively. OTL increased DL 1RM to a greater extent than PVBT (p ≤ 0.05), (OTL: 22.9%, ES: 1.49; PVBT: 10.9%, ES: 0.88). Lastly, there was a main time effect (p ≤ 0.05) for BS, BP and DL PP, (PVBT: 18.3%, ES: 0.86; OTL: 19.8%, ES: 0.79); (PVBT: 14.5%, ES: 0.81; OTL: 27.9%, ES: 1.68); (PVBT: 15.7%, ES: 1.32; OTL: 20.1%, ES: 1.77) respectively. Our data suggest that both VBT regimens are effective for improving muscular performance in college volleyball players during the offseason period.
机译:本研究调查了两种不同速度的训练(VBT)方案对肌肉适应的影响。将十五名女大学排球运动员随机分配到基于渐进的速度培训(PVBT)或最佳训练负荷(OTL)中。这两个团体每周训练三次七周。 PVBT进行了4周的强度块(例如,0.55±0.70 m·S-1),然后进行3周的功率块(例如,0.851.0m·s-1),而OTL在〜0.85×0.9处进行培训M·S-1。在预先训练和培训后,在后蹲(BS),台式压力机(BP)和硬辐射(DL)练习上的1RM和峰值功率输出(PP)评估。 BS和BP 1RM的主要时间效应(P≤0.05)(PVBT:19.6%,ES:1.72; OTL:18.3%,ES:1.57)和(PVBT:8.5%,ES:0.58; OTL:10.2 %,ES:0.72)。 OTL在比PVBT更大的程度上增加DL1RM(P≤0.05),(OTL:22.9%,ES:1.49; PVBT:10.9%,ES:0.88)。最后,BS,BP和DL PP的主时间效应(P≤0.05),(PVBT:18.3%,ES:0.86; OTL:19.8%,ES:0.79); (PVBT:14.5%,ES:0.81; OTL:27.9%,ES:1.68); (PVBT:15.7%,ES:1.32; OTL:20.1%,ES:1.77)。我们的数据表明,在休赛期间,VBT方案均为提高大学排球运动员的肌肉表现。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号