首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Spine Surgery and Related Research >Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy
【2h】

Risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy

机译:多级整体整体脊柱切除术后器械失败的危险因素

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Introduction: Multilevel total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) is required to secure oncologically adequate resection margins. However, no useful information has been reported for spinal reconstruction after multilevel TES. Therefore, this study set out to assess the clinical and radiological outcomes of spinal reconstruction after multilevel TES. Methods: Forty-eight patients treated with multilevel TES at our institute were included in the analysis. Reconstruction was achieved with posterior pedicle screw fixation and an anterior titanium mesh cage filled with iliac autograft in all cases. Spinal shortening was performed to increase spinal stability from the reconstruction. Instrumentation failure and radiological findings were evaluated with radiography and computerized tomography (CT). Results: After excluding one patient whose general condition was deteriorating, radiological evaluations of 47 patients were performed over a period of more than a year. The follow-up time was 17 to 120 months (mean: 70.2 months). Instrumentation failure occurred in one patient (5.9%) after thoracic multilevel TES, in 4 patients (25.0%) after thoracolumbar multilevel TES, and in 3 patients (42.9%) after lumbar multilevel TES. No instrumentation failure was observed in cervicothoracic cases. Cage subsidence (>2 mm) occurred in 30 patients (63.8%). In 22 of them, subsidence appeared on the CT one month after surgery. The risk factors of instrumentation failure included a multilevel TES below the thoracolumbar level and a long span of vertebral resection. There was no instrumentation failure in any of the 11 “disc-to-disc cutting” cases. Conclusions: This study identified the risk factors of instrumentation failure after multilevel TES. There is a high risk of instrumentation failure in cases of long vertebral resection below the thoracolumbar level. On the other hand, our reconstruction method can be successful for multilevel TES above the thoracic level.
机译:简介:需要多层全脊椎切除术(TES)以确保肿瘤学上足够的切除切缘。然而,尚无关于多级TES后脊柱重建的有用信息的报道。因此,本研究着手评估多级TES后脊柱重建的临床和放射学结果。方法:将我院接受多级TES治疗的48例患者纳入分析。在所有情况下,均采用后路椎弓根螺钉固定和装有titanium骨自体移植物的前钛网笼进行重建。进行脊柱缩短以增加重建的脊柱稳定性。通过放射线照相和计算机断层扫描(CT)评估仪器故障和放射学发现。结果:排除一名一般情况恶化的患者后,对47例患者进行了超过一年的放射学评估。随访时间为17到120个月(平均70.2个月)。胸多级TES后1例患者(5.9%),胸腰椎多级TES后4例(25.0%)和腰椎多级TES后3例(42.9%)发生了仪器故障。在颈胸腔病例中未观察到仪器故障。 30例患者(63.8%)发生了笼子下陷(> 2 mm)。其中有22例在术后一个月出现CT下沉。器械失败的危险因素包括胸腰椎水平以下的多级TES和长段椎体切除术。在11个“光盘到光盘切割”案例中,没有仪器故障。结论:本研究确定了多级TES后仪器故障的危险因素。在胸腰段以下进行长椎体切除的情况下,存在仪器故障的高风险。另一方面,对于胸廓以上的多级TES,我们的重建方法可以成功。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号