首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >Estimating PM2.5 Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei
【2h】

Estimating PM2.5 Concentrations Based on MODIS AOD and NAQPMS Data over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei

机译:基于MODIS AOD和NAQPMS数据的京津冀地区PM2.5浓度估算

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Accurately estimating fine ambient particulate matter (PM2.5) is important to assess air quality and to support epidemiological studies. To analyze the spatiotemporal variation of PM2.5 concentrations, previous studies used different methodologies, such as statistical models or neural networks, to estimate PM2.5. However, there is little research on full-coverage PM2.5 estimation using a combination of ground-measured, satellite-estimated, and atmospheric chemical model data. In this study, the linear mixed effect (LME) model, which used the aerosol optical depth (AOD) from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS), meteorological data, normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and elevation data as predictors, was fitted for 2017 over Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei (BTH). The LME model was used to calibrate the PM2.5 concentration using the nested air-quality prediction modeling system (NAQPMS) simulated with ground measurements. The inverse variance weighting (IVW) method was used to fuse satellite-estimated and model-calibrated PM2.5. The results showed a strong agreement with ground measurements, with an overall coefficient (R2) of 0.78 and a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 26.44 μg/m3 in cross-validation (CV). The seasonal R2 values were 0.75, 0.62, 0.80, and 0.78 in the spring, summer, autumn, and winter, respectively. The fusion results supplement the lack of satellite estimates and can capture more detailed information than the NAQPMS model. Therefore, the results will be helpful for pollution process analyses and health-related studies.
机译:准确估算环境细颗粒物(PM2.5)对于评估空气质量和支持流行病学研究很重要。为了分析PM2.5浓度的时空变化,以前的研究使用了不同的方法,例如统计模型或神经网络来估计PM2.5。但是,很少有关于结合地面测量,卫星估计和大气化学模型数据进行全覆盖PM2.5估计的研究。在这项研究中,线性混合效应(LME)模型使用了中分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)的气溶胶光学深度(AOD),气象数据,归一化植被指数(NDVI)和海拔数据作为预测因子,适用于2017年北京-天津-河北(BTH)。 LME模型用于通过地面测量模拟的嵌套空气质量预测建模系统(NAQPMS)来校准PM2.5浓度。逆方差加权(IVW)方法用于融合卫星估计和模型校准的PM2.5。结果显示与地面测量值高度吻合,总系数(R 2 )为0.78,均方根误差(RMSE)为26.44μg/ m 3 在交叉验证(CV)中。春季,夏季,秋季和冬季的季节性R 2 值分别为0.75、0.62、0.80和0.78。融合结果弥补了卫星估计的不足,并且可以捕获比NAQPMS模型更详细的信息。因此,该结果将有助于污染过程分析和健康相关研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号