首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >Intercomparison of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Ground-Based Narrow Band Spectrometers Applied to Crop Trait Monitoring in Organic Potato Production
【2h】

Intercomparison of Unmanned Aerial Vehicle and Ground-Based Narrow Band Spectrometers Applied to Crop Trait Monitoring in Organic Potato Production

机译:无人机与地面窄带光谱仪在有机马铃薯生产中作物性状监测中的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Vegetation properties can be estimated using optical sensors, acquiring data on board of different platforms. For instance, ground-based and Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-borne spectrometers can measure reflectance in narrow spectral bands, while different modelling approaches, like regressions fitted to vegetation indices, can relate spectra with crop traits. Although monitoring frameworks using multiple sensors can be more flexible, they may result in higher inaccuracy due to differences related to the sensors characteristics, which can affect information sampling. Also organic production systems can benefit from continuous monitoring focusing on crop management and stress detection, but few studies have evaluated applications with this objective. In this study, ground-based and UAV spectrometers were compared in the context of organic potato cultivation. Relatively accurate estimates were obtained for leaf chlorophyll (RMSE = 6.07 µg·cm−2), leaf area index (RMSE = 0.67 m2·m−2), canopy chlorophyll (RMSE = 0.24 g·m−2) and ground cover (RMSE = 5.5%) using five UAV-based data acquisitions, from 43 to 99 days after planting. These retrievals are slightly better than those derived from ground-based measurements (RMSE = 7.25 µg·cm−2, 0.85 m2·m−2, 0.28 g·m−2 and 6.8%, respectively), for the same period. Excluding observations corresponding to the first acquisition increased retrieval accuracy and made outputs more comparable between sensors, due to relatively low vegetation cover on this date. Intercomparison of vegetation indices indicated that indices based on the contrast between spectral bands in the visible and near-infrared, like OSAVI, MCARI2 and CIg provided, at certain extent, robust outputs that could be transferred between sensors. Information sampling at plot level by both sensing solutions resulted in comparable discriminative potential concerning advanced stages of late blight incidence. These results indicate that optical sensors, and their integration, have great potential for monitoring this specific organic cropping system.
机译:可以使用光学传感器估算植被性质,在不同平台上采集数据。例如,基于地面和无人飞行器(UAV)的光谱仪可以测量窄光谱带中的反射率,而不同的建模方法(如拟合植被指数的回归方法)可以将光谱与作物特性相关联。尽管使用多个传感器的监视框架可以更加灵活,但是由于与传感器特性相关的差异可能会导致更高的不准确性,从而影响信息采样。有机生产系统也可以从专注于作物管理和压力检测的连续监测中受益,但是很少有研究评估此目标的应用。在这项研究中,比较了有机马铃薯栽培中的地面光谱仪和无人机光谱仪。对叶绿素(RMSE = 6.07 µg·cm -2 ),叶面积指数(RMSE = 0.67 m 2 ·m -2 < / sup>),树冠叶绿素(RMSE = 0.24 g·m -2 )和地被植物(RMSE = 5.5%),使用了五种基于UAV的数据,从种植后43天到99天不等。这些检索结果比从地面测量得出的结果略好(RMSE = 7.25 µg·cm -2 ,0.85 m 2 ·m -2 ,分别为0.28 g·m −2 和6.8%。排除与第一次采集相对应的观测值,由于该日期的植被覆盖率较低,因此提高了检索精度,并使传感器之间的输出更具可比性。植被指数的比对表明,基于可见光和近红外光谱带之间的对比度的指数(例如OSAVI,MCARI2和CIg)在一定程度上提供了可以在传感器之间传输的强大输出。两种感测解决方案在样地水平上进行的信息采样导致了关于晚疫病晚期发展阶段的可比判别潜力。这些结果表明,光学传感器及其集成,对于监测这种特定的有机种植系统具有巨大的潜力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号