首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Sensors (Basel Switzerland) >Estimation of Biomass and Canopy Height in Bermudagrass Alfalfa and Wheat Using Ultrasonic Laser and Spectral Sensors
【2h】

Estimation of Biomass and Canopy Height in Bermudagrass Alfalfa and Wheat Using Ultrasonic Laser and Spectral Sensors

机译:利用超声波激光和光谱传感器估算百慕大草苜蓿和小麦的生物量和冠层高度

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Non-destructive biomass estimation of vegetation has been performed via remote sensing as well as physical measurements. An effective method for estimating biomass must have accuracy comparable to the accepted standard of destructive removal. Estimation or measurement of height is commonly employed to create a relationship between height and mass. This study examined several types of ground-based mobile sensing strategies for forage biomass estimation. Forage production experiments consisting of alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), bermudagrass [Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers.], and wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) were employed to examine sensor biomass estimation (laser, ultrasonic, and spectral) as compared to physical measurements (plate meter and meter stick) and the traditional harvest method (clipping). Predictive models were constructed via partial least squares regression and modeled estimates were compared to the physically measured biomass. Least significant difference separated mean estimates were examined to evaluate differences in the physical measurements and sensor estimates for canopy height and biomass. Differences between methods were minimal (average percent error of 11.2% for difference between predicted values versus machine and quadrat harvested biomass values (1.64 and 4.91 t·ha−1, respectively), except at the lowest measured biomass (average percent error of 89% for harvester and quad harvested biomass < 0.79 t·ha−1) and greatest measured biomass (average percent error of 18% for harvester and quad harvested biomass >6.4 t·ha−1). These data suggest that using mobile sensor-based biomass estimation models could be an effective alternative to the traditional clipping method for rapid, accurate in-field biomass estimation.
机译:植被的非破坏性生物量估算已通过遥感和物理测量进行。估算生物量的有效方法必须具有与公认的破坏性去除标准相当的精度。通常使用高度的估计或度量来创建高度和质量之间的关系。这项研究检查了几种用于饲料生物量估计的地面移动感测策略。饲草生产试验由苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.),百慕大草(Cynodon dactylon(L.)Pers。)和小麦(Triticum aestivum L.)组成,用于比较传感器的生物量估算(激光,超声和光谱)进行物理测量(板式仪表和米尺)和传统的收获方法(剪裁)。通过偏最小二乘回归构建预测模型,并将建模的估计值与物理测量的生物量进行比较。检查了最小显着差异分离的均值估计值,以评估物理测量值和冠层高度和生物量传感器估计值的差异。两种方法之间的差异很小(预测值与机器和四方收获生物量值之间的差异的平均百分比误差为11.2%(分别为1.64和4.91 t·ha -1 ),除了最低的测得生物量(收获机和四重收获生物量的平均百分比误差为89%<0.79​​ t·ha -1 )和最大测量生物量(收获机和四重收获生物量的平均百分比误差为18%> 6.4 t·ha -1 )。这些数据表明,使用基于移动传感器的生物量估算模型可以有效替代传统的裁剪方法,以进行快速,准确的田间生物量估算。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号