首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Schizophrenia Bulletin >SU110. Meaning-Making Self-identity and Ambivalence Around Antipsychotics in First-Episode Psychosis
【2h】

SU110. Meaning-Making Self-identity and Ambivalence Around Antipsychotics in First-Episode Psychosis

机译:SU110。初发性精神病患者抗精神病药的意义自我认同和矛盾心理

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Background: An issue throughout all areas of medicine, nonadherence to medications is particularly challenging in first-episode psychosis (FEP), where discontinuation of medications has been found to be one of the most reliable predictors of relapse after symptom remission (Haddad et al, 2014; Alvarez-Jimenez et al, 2012). And while medication factors and patient expectancies are frequently employed to understand challenges surrounding adherence, there are limits to their explanatory power. >Methods: Utilizing ethnographic methodologies, we collected and analyzed narratives of FEP clinic users in order to explore relationships between experiences of illness, contacts with the mental health system, and medication nonadherence. Data were composed of text materials relating to early intervention and first-episode psychosis and antipsychotic medications, longitudinal key informant interviews, and participant observation in a FEP clinic setting in Toronto, Canada. An interpretive thematic analysis of interview transcripts, field notes, and texts was subsequently undertaken, and emerging themes developed iteratively through multiple readings of the texts; the use of multiple coders, member checks, and the range of data sources enabled triangulation of the established themes. >Results: The imperative to consistently ingest or inject psychiatric medications can, at times, clash with the lived experience of those struggling to reorient a sense of self in the aftermath of a psychotic illness. Frictions exist between subjective meanings attached to experiences of psychosis and their biomedical framing, leading to ruptures in the clinical setting that are dramatized around medication use. >Conclusion: This pilot study demonstrates that a much broader scope of subjective and intersubjective experience is salient to issues surrounding medication use in first-episode psychosis. Moreover, meanings attached to medications are continually shifting, imbued with ambivalence, and overdetermined. As such, limiting analyses of antipsychotic adherence to medication-centric factors and cross-sectional methodologies fail to encapsulate the breadth of relevant meanings and experiences to medications and their mutable nature. These findings offer insights that may further facilitate engagement of individuals around medications and within first-episode services more broadly.
机译:>背景:在医学的所有领域都存在着一个问题,即不坚持药物治疗对于首发性精神病(FEP)尤其具有挑战性,在该疾病中,停药被认为是最可靠的复发预测指标之一症状缓解(Haddad等人,2014; Alvarez-Jimenez等人,2012)。虽然经常使用药物因素和患者期望值来了解围绕依从性的挑战,但其解释力有限。 >方法:我们使用人种学方法,收集并分析了FEP诊所用户的叙述,以探索疾病经历,与心理健康系统的接触以及药物不依从之间的关系。数据由与早期干预和首发精神病和抗精神病药物有关的文字材料,纵向关键知情人访谈以及在加拿大多伦多的FEP诊所中的参与者观察组成。随后对访谈笔录,现场笔记和文本进行了解释性的主题分析,并且通过多次阅读文本反复出现了新出现的主题;通过使用多个编码器,成员检查以及数据源范围,可以对既定主题进行三角测量。 >结果:持续摄入或注射精神药物的必要性有时可能会与那些在精神病之后努力重新定位自我的人们的生活经历发生冲突。精神病经历与其生物医学框架相关的主观含义之间存在摩擦,导致临床环境中的破裂,这种破裂在药物使用方面引起了戏剧性的变化。 >结论:这项初步研究表明,主观和主体间经验的广泛范围对于首发精神病中药物使用的相关问题非常重要。此外,与药物有关的含义不断变化,充满矛盾和过分确定。因此,将抗精神病药物依从性以药物为中心的因素和横断面方法进行的有限分析无法囊括药物的相关含义和经验及其可变性的广度。这些发现提供了见解,可以进一步促进个人围绕药物和更广泛地参与首发服务。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号