首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Schizophrenia Bulletin >61.1 Introspective Accuracy as a Predictor of Real-World Outcomes
【2h】

61.1 Introspective Accuracy as a Predictor of Real-World Outcomes

机译:61.1内省精度可预测实际结果

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

>Background: Although cognitive performance and functional capacity are potent predictors of achievement in everyday activities, much like social cognition is a predictor of social functioning, other mediating factors are important. These mediators include self-efficacy, motivation, and, importantly, introspective accuracy. In this presentation, we discuss the role of introspective accuracy as a predictor of real world outcomes in residential, vocational, and social domains in samples of people with schizophrenia. >Methods: Two separate studies were conducted. Both studies included self-reports and informant ratings of everyday functioning as well as performance-based assessments of cognitive performance and functional capacity. In the first study, patients with schizophrenia (n = 214) were asked to self-evaluate their cognitive performance and these assessments were compared to informant ratings to yield a difference score. In the second study, patients (n = 53) were asked to self-assess their social cognitive abilities, which were also compared to informant ratings on the same scale. In the second study, patients also performed several tests of social cognition and in one of the tests they were asked to provide confidence ratings for the quality of their performance, which were examined across correct and incorrect responses. >Results: In the first study, discrepancies between self-reported and informant-rated cognitive abilities were the strongest predictor of everyday activities and vocational functioning: more important than cognitive test performance and functional capacity. In the second study, self-reports of everyday social functioning were correlated with self-reported social cognition ability but not with actual performance on tests of social cognition. Social cognitive test performance was correlated with informant reports of both social functioning and social cognitive ability. Finally, and most important, impaired self-assessment of social cognitive ability, indexed by higher levels of confidence while making incorrect responses on social cognitive tests, was correlated with poorer informant-rated social outcomes. >Conclusion: Problems in the ability to evaluate competence in neurocognitive and social cognitive domains directly contribute to domain-specific deficits in everyday functioning. These contributions are substantial and impairment in self-assessment of competence appears very similar in its nature across neurocognitive and social cognitive domains. Identification of a neurobiological basis of these impairments may lead to treatment developments.
机译:>背景:尽管认知能力和功能能力是日常活动中成就的有效预测指标,就像社交认知是社交功能的预测指标一样,其他中介因素也很重要。这些中介包括自我效能感,动机,以及重要的是内省的准确性。在本演示文稿中,我们讨论了内省准确性作为精神分裂症患者样本在居住,职业和社会领域中现实世界结果的预测指标的作用。 >方法:分别进行了两项研究。两项研究均包括自我报告和日常功能的知情者评分,以及基于性能的认知表现和功能能力评估。在第一项研究中,要求精神分裂症患者(n = 214)自我评估其认知能力,并将这些评估与知情者评分进行比较以产生差异评分。在第二项研究中,要求患者(n = 53)自我评估其社交认知能力,并将其与相同规模的知情者评分进行比较。在第二项研究中,患者还进行了几项社交认知测试,并且在一项测试中,他们被要求对他们的表现质量提供置信度等级,并通过正确和不正确的回答对其进行检查。 >结果:在第一项研究中,自我报告和知情者评分的认知能力之间的差异是日常活动和职业功能的最强预测指标:比认知测试的表现和功能更重要。在第二项研究中,日常社交功能的自我报告与自我报告的社会认知能力相关,但与社交认知测试的实际表现无关。社会认知测试的表现与社会功能和社会认知能力的报告人相关。最后,最重要的是,对社交认知能力的自我评估受损,是由较高的信心水平所指数,而对社交认知测验做出不正确的反应所导致的,则与较差的知情者所评估的社交成果有关。 >结论:在神经认知和社会认知领域评估能力的问题直接导致了日常工作中特定领域的缺陷。这些贡献是巨大的,能力自我评估的障碍在神经认知和社会认知领域的性质上似乎非常相似。确定这些损伤的神经生物学基础可能会导致治疗的发展。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号