首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Romanian Journal of Ophthalmology >Hydroimplantation versus viscoimplantation: comparison of intraocular lens implantation with and without ophthalmic viscoelastic device in phacoemulsification
【2h】

Hydroimplantation versus viscoimplantation: comparison of intraocular lens implantation with and without ophthalmic viscoelastic device in phacoemulsification

机译:水力植入与粘着植入:在超声乳化术中使用和不使用眼部粘弹性装置的人工晶状体植入的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

>Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of intraocular lens implantation with and without ophthalmic viscoelastic device in phacoemulsification.>Methods: A randomized prospective study was conducted on 84 eyes of 84 patients who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification by the same surgeon. Patients were divided into two groups after the completion of lens cortex removal. Intraocular lens implantation was performed with balanced salt solution irrigation in group H (n=42, hydroimplantation) and with ophthalmic viscoelastic device in group V (n=42, viscoimplantation). The main outcomes measured were postoperative changes of intraocular pressure (IOP), central corneal thickness (CCT), mean absolute refractive error, time of surgery, and the frequency of complications. Patients were evaluated 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively.>Results: There was no significant difference in mean age, gender, preoperative IOP and preoperative CCT between the two groups. IOP and CCT were not significantly different 1 day, 1 week, and 1 month postoperatively between the two groups. Mean absolute refractive error was also not significantly different between the two groups. Time of surgery was significantly lower in group H than in group V (953.81 ± 88.33 seconds, 1072.33 ± 172.16 seconds, respectively, p<0.001). No other complications were observed during the intraocular lens implantation in the two groups.>Conclusions: Hydroimplantation technique is safe and effective in phacoemulsification. Furthermore, reduced time of surgery and reduced cost of ophthalmic viscoelastic devices are the advantages of this technique.>Abbreviations: OVDs = ophthalmic viscosurgical devices; IOP = intraocular pressure; MARE = mean absolute refractive error; CCT = central corneal thickness; CDE = cumulative dissipated energy; AL = axial length; ACD = anterior chamber depth; ACM = anterior chamber maintainer; ECCE = extracapsular cataract extraction
机译:>目的:为了比较白内障超声乳化术中有无眼粘弹性装置人工晶状体植入术的有效性和安全性。>方法:对84例患者中的84眼进行了一项随机前瞻性研究由同一位外科医生进行了无创超声乳化手术。摘除晶状体皮质后,将患者分为两组。 H组(n = 42,加水)采用平衡盐溶液冲洗进行人工晶状体植入,V组(n = 42,粘着植入)采用眼粘弹性装置进行人工晶状体植入。测量的主要结果是术后眼内压(IOP),中央角膜厚度(CCT),平均绝对屈光不正,手术时间和并发症发生率的变化。在术后1天,1周和1个月对患者进行评估。>结果:两组的平均年龄,性别,术前IOP和术前CCT均无显着差异。两组术后1天,1周和1个月的IOP和CCT没有显着差异。两组之间的平均绝对屈光误差也没有显着差异。 H组的手术时间明显低于V组(分别为953.81±88.33秒,1072.33±172.16秒,p <0.001)。两组人工晶状体植入术中未观察到其他并发症。>结论:人工晶状体植入术安全有效。此外,减少手术时间和降低眼科粘弹性装置的成本是该技术的优势。>缩写: OVDs =眼科粘膜外科手术装置; IOP =眼压; MARE =平均绝对屈光误差; CCT =中央角膜厚度; CDE =累积耗散能量; AL =轴向长度; ACD =前房深度; ACM =前房维持者; ECCE =囊外白内障摘除

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号