首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Reumatologia >Cardiovascular risk assessment in rheumatoid arthritis – controversies and the new approach
【2h】

Cardiovascular risk assessment in rheumatoid arthritis – controversies and the new approach

机译:类风湿关节炎的心血管风险评估-争议和新方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The current methods of cardiovascular (CV) risk assessment in the course of inflammatory connective tissue diseases are a subject of considerable controversy. Comparing different methods of CV risk assessment in current rheumatoid arthritis (RA) guidelines, only a few of them recommend the use of formal risk calculators. These are the EULAR guidelines suggesting the use of SCORE and the British Society for Rheumatology guidelines performed in collaboration with NICE preferring the use of QRISK-2. Analyzing the latest American and British reports, two main concepts could be identified. The first one is to focus on risk calculators developed for the general population taking into account RA, and the calculator that might fulfill this role is the new QRISK-2 presented by NICE in 2014. The second concept is to create RA-specific risk calculators, such as the Expanded Cardiovascular Risk Prediction Score for RA. In this review we also discuss the efficiency of a new Pooled Cohort Equation and other calculators in the general and RA population.
机译:在炎性结缔组织疾病过程中,当前的心血管(CV)风险评估方法是一个颇有争议的话题。比较当前类风湿关节炎(RA)指南中CV风险评估的不同方法,只有少数人建议使用正式的风险计算器。这些是建议使用SCORE的EULAR指南以及与NICE合作执行的英国风湿病学会指南,但更倾向于使用QRISK-2。通过分析最新的美国和英国报告,可以确定两个主要概念。第一个重点是在考虑到RA的情况下针对针对普通人群开发的风险计算器,而可能扮演这一角色的计算器是NICE在2014年提出的新QRISK-2。第二个概念是创建针对RA的风险计算器,例如RA的扩展心血管风险预测评分。在这篇评论中,我们还讨论了新的合并队列方程和其他计算器在一般人群和RA人群中的效率。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号