首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Royal Society Open Science >Interaction between stimulus contrast and pre-saccadic crowding
【2h】

Interaction between stimulus contrast and pre-saccadic crowding

机译:刺激对比和课前拥挤之间的相互作用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objects that are briefly flashed around the time of saccades are mislocalized. Previously, robust interactions between saccadic perceptual distortions and stimulus contrast have been reported. It is also known that crowding depends on the contrast of the target and flankers. Here, we investigated how stimulus contrast and crowding interact with pre-saccadic perception. We asked observers to report the orientation of a tilted Gabor presented in the periphery, with or without four flanking vertically oriented Gabors. Observers performed the task either following a saccade or while maintaining fixation. Contrasts of the target and flankers were independently set to either high or low, with equal probability. In both the fixation and saccade conditions, the flanked conditions resulted in worse discrimination performance—the crowding effect. In the unflanked saccade trials, performance significantly decreased with target-to-saccade onset for low-contrast targets but not for high-contrast targets. In the presence of flankers, impending saccades reduced performance only for low-contrast, but not for high-contrast flankers. Interestingly, average performance in the fixation and saccade conditions was mostly similar in all contrast conditions. Moreover, the magnitude of crowding was influenced by saccades only when the target had high contrast and the flankers had low contrasts. Overall, our results are consistent with modulation of perisaccadic spatial localization by contrast and saccadic suppression, but at odds with a recent report of pre-saccadic release of crowding.
机译:在扫视期间短暂闪烁的对象的位置错误。以前,已经报道了眼跳感知失真和刺激对比之间的强大相互作用。还已知拥挤取决于目标和侧翼的对比度。在这里,我们研究了刺激对比和拥挤与眼前的感知如何相互作用。我们要求观察者报告外围出现的倾斜式Gabor的方向,有或没有四个侧面的垂直取向的Gabor。观察者在扫视后或保持注视时执行了任务。目标和侧翼的对比度被独立设置为高或低,且概率相同。在注视和扫视条件下,侧翼条件都会导致较差的辨别性能-拥挤效应。在无侧翼扫视试验中,对于低对比度目标,目标到扫视开始时的性能显着降低,但对于高对比度目标,则没有。在有侧翼的情况下,即将到来的扫视运动只会降低低对比度的性能,而不会降低高对比度的侧翼的性能。有趣的是,在所有对比条件下,注视和扫视条件下的平均性能几乎相似。此外,拥挤的程度仅在目标具有高对比度而侧翼具有低对比度时才受扫视影响。总的来说,我们的研究结果与通过对比和抑制眼跳来调节眼周周围的空间定位是一致的,但是与最近关于眼前排挤的报道相矛盾。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号