首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Pulmonary Circulation >Novel approach to classifying patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension using cluster analysis
【2h】

Novel approach to classifying patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension using cluster analysis

机译:使用聚类分析对肺动脉高压患者进行分类的新方法

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) patients have distinct disease courses and responses to treatment, but current diagnostic and treatment schemes provide limited insight. We aimed to see if cluster analysis could distinguish clinical phenotypes in PAH. An unbiased cluster analysis was performed on 17 baseline clinical variables of PAH patients from the FREEDOM-M, FREEDOM-C, and FREEDOM-C2 randomized trials of oral treprostinil versus placebo. Participants were either treatment-naïve (FREEDOM-M) or on background therapy (FREEDOM-C, FREEDOM-C2). We tested for association of clusters with outcomes and interaction with respect to treatment. Primary outcome was 6-minute walking distance (6MWD) change. We included 966 participants with 12-week (FREEDOM-M) or 16-week (FREEDOM-C and FREEDOM-C2) follow-up. Four patient clusters were identified. Compared with Clusters 1 (n = 131) and 2 (n = 496), Clusters 3 (n = 246) and 4 (n = 93) patients were older, heavier, had worse baseline functional class, 6MWD, Borg Dyspnea Index, and fewer years since PAH diagnosis. Clusters also differed by PAH etiology and background therapies, but not gender or race. Mean treatment effect of oral treprostinil differed across Clusters 1–4 increased in a monotonic fashion (Cluster 1: 10.9 m; Cluster 2: 13.0 m; Cluster 3: 25.0 m; Cluster 4: 50.9 m; interaction P value = 0.048). We identified four distinct clusters of PAH patients based on common patient characteristics. Patients who were older, diagnosed with PAH for a shorter period, and had worse baseline symptoms and exercise capacity had the greatest response to oral treprostinil treatment.
机译:肺动脉高压(PAH)患者的病程和对治疗的反应不同,但是当前的诊断和治疗方案提供的见解有限。我们旨在观察聚类分析是否可以区分PAH中的临床表型。对口服曲前列环素与安慰剂的FREEDOM-M,FREEDOM-C和FREEDOM-C2随机试验对PAH患者的17个基线临床变量进行了无偏聚分析。参与者要么是单纯治疗(FREEDOM-M),要么是背景治疗(FREEDOM-C,FREEDOM-C2)。我们测试了集群与治疗效果之间的关联以及结果和相互作用。主要结果是步行6分钟的步行距离(6MWD)发生变化。我们纳入了966名参与者,随访时间为12周(FREEDOM-M)或16周(FREEDOM-C和FREEDOM-C2)。确定了四个病人群。与群集1(n = 131)和2(n =)496)相比,群集3(n)=(246)和4(n = 93)患者年龄更大,更重,基线功能等级,6MWD,Borg呼吸困难指数和自PAH诊断以来的年限较短。 PAH的病因学和背景疗法也不同,但性别或种族没有差异。口服曲前列环素的平均治疗效果在簇1-4之间以单调方式增加(簇1:10.9μm;簇2:13.0μm;簇3:25.0μm;簇4:50.9μm;相互作用P值= 0.048)。我们根据患者的共同特征确定了四个不同的PAH患者群。年龄较大,诊断为PAH时间较短,基线症状和运动能力较差的患者对口服曲前列环素治疗的反应最大。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号