首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Knowledge infrastructure and safe operating spaces in social–ecological systems
【2h】

Knowledge infrastructure and safe operating spaces in social–ecological systems

机译:社会生态系统中的知识基础设施和安全运营空间

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Maintaining safe operating spaces for exploited natural systems in the face of uncertainty is a key sustainability challenge. This challenge can be viewed as a problem in which human society must navigate in a limited space of acceptable futures in which humans enjoy sufficient well-being and avoid crossing planetary boundaries. A critical obstacle is the nature of society as a controller with endogenous dynamics affected by knowledge, values, and decision-making fallacies. We outline an approach for analyzing the role of knowledge infrastructure in maintaining safe operating spaces. Using a classic natural resource problem as an illustration, we find that a small safe operating space exists that is insensitive to the type of policy implementation, while in general, a larger safe operating space exists which is dependent on the implementation of the “right” policy. Our analysis suggests the importance of considering societal response dynamics to varying policy instruments in defining the shape of safe operating spaces.
机译:面对不确定性,为已开发的自然系统维护安全的操作空间是一项关键的可持续性挑战。可以将这一挑战视为一个问题,人类社会必须在有限的可接受的未来空间中航行,在该空间中人类享有足够的福祉并避免跨越地球边界。一个关键的障碍是社会的本质是控制者,其内生动力受知识,价值和决策谬误的影响。我们概述了一种分析知识基础架构在维护安全操作空间中的作用的方法。以经典的自然资源问题为例,我们发现存在一个小的安全操作空间,该空间对策略实施的类型不敏感,而总的来说,存在较大的安全操作空间,这取决于“正确”的实施政策。我们的分析表明,在定义安全操作空间的形状时,考虑社会对各种政策工具的反应动态的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号