【2h】

The low but uncertain measured benefits of US water quality policy

机译:美国水质政策的可衡量收益低但不确定

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

US investment to decrease pollution in rivers, lakes, and other surface waters has exceeded $1.9 trillion since 1960, and has also exceeded the cost of most other US environmental initiatives. These investments come both from the 1972 Clean Water Act and the largely voluntary efforts to control pollution from agriculture and urban runoff. This paper reviews the methods and conclusions of about 20 recent evaluations of these policies. Surprisingly, most analyses estimate that these policies’ benefits are much smaller than their costs; the benefit–cost ratio from the median study is 0.37. However, existing evidence is limited and undercounts many types of benefits. We conclude that it is unclear whether many of these regulations truly fail a benefit–cost test or whether existing evidence understates their net benefits; we also describe specific questions that when answered would help eliminate this uncertainty.
机译:自1960年以来,美国用于减少河流,湖泊和其他地表水污染的投资已超过1.9万亿美元,并且也超过了美国其他大多数环境计划的成本。这些投资既来自1972年的《清洁水法》,又来自于自愿控制农业和城市径流污染的努力。本文回顾了有关这些政策的近20次评估的方法和结论。出乎意料的是,大多数分析估计这些政策的收益远小于其成本。中位数研究的收益成本比为0.37。但是,现有证据有限,低估了许多类型的收益。我们得出结论,目前尚不清楚这些法规中的许多法规是否真的没有通过福利成本测试,或者现有证据是否低估了其净利益?我们还将描述一些具体的问题,这些问题在回答时将有助于消除这种不确定性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号