【2h】

A compensation election for binary social choice

机译:二元社会选择补偿选举

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We report experimental results examining the properties of a bidding mechanism, the “Compensation Election,” which is designed to implement a simple binary choice between two options. We may think of the group decision problem as a choice between a new rule and the status quo. The rule and the status quo are each common outcomes that apply across all individuals, but the value or cost that they induce on each individual differs according to each individual's circumstances: some gain, some lose, and others are unaffected by a change to the new from the old. Rather than casting votes, each subject submits a bid reflecting his willingness to pay to induce the group to select one option and the amount he wishes to be paid if the alternative option is selected. The Compensation Election chooses the option that receives the highest sum of bids. We find that, although the Compensation Election allows subjects to strategically bid above their value (or even for the option they do not prefer), such behavior is not the norm. We also find that subjects' bids more truthfully reveal their values when there are more bidders in the election.
机译:我们报告了一些实验结果,这些结果检查了出价机制“补偿选择”的属性,该机制旨在实现两个选项之间的简单二进制选择。我们可以将群体决策问题视为在新规则和现状之间进行选择。规则和现状都是适用于所有个体的共同结果,但是它们对每个个体产生的价值或成本因每个个体的情况而异:某些收益,某些损失以及其他不受新产品变更的影响从旧的。每个主题都不会投赞成票,而是反映其愿意支付的费用,以诱使该组选择一个选项,以及如果希望选择其他选项,他希望支付的金额。薪酬选举会选择出价最高的选项。我们发现,尽管“补偿选举”允许主体从战略上出价高于其价值(甚至是他们不喜欢的选择),但这种行为不是正常现象。我们还发现,当选举中有更多竞标者时,主体的竞标会更真实地显示其价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号