首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) >Replacement of the aortic valve with a bioprosthesis at the time of continuous flow ventricular assist device implantation for preexisting aortic valve dysfunction
【2h】

Replacement of the aortic valve with a bioprosthesis at the time of continuous flow ventricular assist device implantation for preexisting aortic valve dysfunction

机译:连续流性心室辅助装置植入时因生物膜置换主动脉瓣导致的主动脉瓣功能障碍

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation has become a mainstay of therapy for advanced heart failure patients who are either ineligible for, or awaiting, cardiac transplantation. Controversy remains over the optimal therapeutic strategy for preexisting aortic valvular dysfunction in these patients at the time of LVAD implant. In patients with moderate to severe aortic regurgitation, surgical approaches are center specific and range from variable leaflet closure techniques to concomitant aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a bioprosthesis. In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed our outcomes in patients who underwent simultaneous AVR and LVAD implantation secondary to antecedent aortic valve pathology. Between January 2004 and June 2010, 144 patients underwent LVAD implantation at a single institution. Of these, 7 patients (4.8%) required concomitant AVR. Five of the 7 patients (71%) survived to hospital discharge and suffered no adverse events in the perioperative period. One-year survival for the discharged patients was 80%, and no prosthetic valve-related adverse events were observed in long-term follow-up. Given our experience, we conclude that bioprosthetic AVR is a plausible alternative for end-stage heart failure patients at the time of LVAD implantation.
机译:左心室辅助装置(LVAD)的植入已成为不适合或正在等待心脏移植的晚期心力衰竭患者的治疗手段。 LVAD植入时这些患者中先前存在主动脉瓣功能不全的最佳治疗策略仍存在争议。对于中度至重度主动脉瓣关闭不全的患者,手术方法具有中心特异性,范围从可变的瓣叶关闭技术到伴有生物假体的主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)。在本研究中,我们回顾性分析了在前主动脉瓣病理继发的同时进行AVR和LVAD植入的患者的预后。在2004年1月至2010年6月之间,有144例患者在单个机构接受了LVAD植入。在这些患者中,有7名患者(4.8%)需要伴随AVR。 7例患者中有5例(71%)存活至出院,围手术期未发生不良事件。出院患者的一年生存率为80%,并且在长期随访中未观察到与人工瓣膜相关的不良事件。根据我们的经验,我们得出结论,对于LVAD植入时末期心力衰竭患者,生物假体AVR是可行的替代方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号